How experimentally robust is Giant Dipole Resonance in 88Be?

In summary, the paper investigates the experimental robustness of Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) in the isotope 88Be. Through a combination of experimental data and theoretical models, the study examines the characteristics and reliability of GDR as a nuclear behavior indicator in this specific isotope. The findings suggest that while GDR is a significant phenomenon, variations in experimental conditions and interpretations can impact its robustness, necessitating careful consideration in future research and applications.
  • #1
kodama
1,026
139
TL;DR Summary
experiments on Giant Dipole Resonance
I saw this paper,

Observation of the X17 anomaly in the decay of the Giant Dipole Resonance of 88Be​

[*]2308.06473
Angular correlation spectra of e+e−e+e− pairs produced in the 77Li(pp,γγ)88Be nuclear reaction were studied at a proton beam energy of EpEp~=~4.0~MeV, which corresponds to the excitation energy of the Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) in 88Be. The spectra measured show a peak like anomaly at 120∘∘ and a broader anomaly also above 140∘∘. Both anomalies could consistently be described by assuming that the same hypothetical X17 particle was created both in the ground-state transition and in the transition going to the broad (ΓΓ=1.5~MeV), first excited state in 88Be. The invariant mass of the particle, which was derived to be mXc2 = 16.95±0.48mXc2 = 16.95±0.48(stat.) ~MeV, agrees well with our previously published values.

arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2209.10795
I would like to know how robust and how established is experiments involving on Giant Dipole Resonance

How easy would another research team to use on Giant Dipole Resonance reproduce these results
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Oh look, it's the same group of authors again. Weird how this proposed particle exclusively exists in their lab.

Shooting 4 MeV protons into lithium and looking for electron/positron pairs should be relatively simple, but I think it would be a waste of time unless there is a reason better than "debunking the most recent nonsense from Krasznahorkay et al".
 
  • Like
Likes kodama, ohwilleke and Vanadium 50
  • #3
mfb said:
Oh look, it's the same group of authors again
Interestingly, Krasznahorkay fils is back on the author list. For a while it was only Krasznahorkay pere. I bet there's a story there.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #4
Vanadium 50 said:
Interestingly, Krasznahorkay fils is back on the author list. For a while it was only Krasznahorkay pere. I bet there's a story there.
Maybe Dad has decided he's getting old and wanted to spend some of his summer holiday going fishing, or traveling with his wife while he's still healthy enough, when he's already a full professor with tenure and getting close to emeritus status, and trusts his son to lighten his load a little so he can do that, while allowing them to bond over physics when they do work on the paper?

Those were the kinds of stories I saw and continue to see having lived all of my life in college towns until I finished my graduate degree, and then keeping in touch with my peers and their academic parents in the decades that followed.
 
  • #5
mfb said:
Oh look, it's the same group of authors again. Weird how this proposed particle exclusively exists in their lab.

Shooting 4 MeV protons into lithium and looking for electron/positron pairs should be relatively simple, but I think it would be a waste of time unless there is a reason better than "debunking the most recent nonsense from Krasznahorkay et al".
claims of x17 aside, so what is the purpose of giant dipole experiments? are they easy to do? the actual purpose of the thread is I'd like to learn more about giant dipole experiments

 

FAQ: How experimentally robust is Giant Dipole Resonance in 88Be?

What is Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) in 8Be?

Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) in 8Be refers to a collective excitation mode where protons and neutrons in the nucleus oscillate out of phase with each other, creating a high-frequency electromagnetic radiation. This phenomenon is observed in many nuclei and is characterized by a large cross-section for photon absorption.

How is the GDR in 8Be experimentally observed?

The GDR in 8Be is typically observed using photonuclear reactions, where high-energy photons are directed at the 8Be nucleus. Detectors measure the resulting gamma rays or particles emitted from the excited nucleus, allowing researchers to analyze the resonance properties.

What experimental techniques are used to measure the robustness of GDR in 8Be?

Experimental techniques for measuring the robustness of GDR in 8Be include gamma-ray spectroscopy, photon scattering experiments, and the use of high-resolution detectors to capture the energy and angular distributions of emitted particles. These methods help determine the energy, width, and strength of the resonance.

What factors affect the experimental robustness of GDR in 8Be?

The experimental robustness of GDR in 8Be can be affected by factors such as the purity and stability of the 8Be target, the energy resolution of the detectors, the intensity and energy of the incident photon beam, and the experimental setup's ability to minimize background noise and other sources of error.

What are the typical experimental challenges in studying GDR in 8Be?

Typical experimental challenges in studying GDR in 8Be include the short half-life of 8Be, which makes it difficult to prepare and maintain a stable target, the need for high-precision detectors to accurately measure the resonance characteristics, and the requirement to isolate the GDR signal from other nuclear reactions and background noise.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top