How Fast Can Two Blocks Move Without Sliding Apart?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chris097
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the minimum time for two blocks to move 7.00 m without the top block sliding off the lower block, given specific coefficients of friction. The maximum static friction force is calculated as 17.4696 N, while the kinetic friction force is 5.3339 N, leading to a net force of 12.1357 N. The acceleration of the system is determined to be 3.0801 m/s². Participants clarify that only the mass of the bottom block should be used in subsequent calculations for acceleration. The final time calculated for the motion is 2.13 seconds.
chris097
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

The coefficient of static friction is 0.636 between the two blocks shown. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.138. Force F causes both blocks to cross a distance of 7.00 m, starting from rest. What is the least amount of time in which the motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block, if the mass of the lower block is 1.14 kg and the mass of the upper block is 2.80 kg?

http://capa.physics.mcmaster.ca/figures/kn/Graph08/kn-pic0832.png


The attempt at a solution

Fmax= UsN
=(.636)(2.80*9.81)
=17.4696 N

F(bottom) = UkN
= (.138)((2.80 + 1.14) * 9.81)
=5.3339

Fnet = 17.4696 - 5.3339
=12.1357

F=ma
a=F/m
=12.1357/(1.14+2.8)
=3.0801

d=v1*t + .5at^2
t=square root of (d/(.5a))
= square root of (7/(.5(3.0801)))
=2.13 s


where am i going wrong?
thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
chris097 said:
Fmax= UsN
=(.636)(2.80*9.81)
=17.4696 N

F(bottom) = UkN
= (.138)((2.80 + 1.14) * 9.81)
=5.3339

Fnet = 17.4696 - 5.3339
=12.1357

this is the maximum net force that can accelerate the bottom block.
you should consider only the acceleration of the bottom block
in your next calculation.
 
Thank you.

But what do you mean consider on the bottom block. Do you mean use only the weight of the bottom block?
 
chris097 said:
Thank you.

But what do you mean consider on the bottom block. Do you mean use only the weight of the bottom block?

yes. Since you found the maximum net force on the bottom block, then you need to use the mass and the acceleration of the bottom block as well in F = ma
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top