How friction acts on a block moving down a slope moving side to side

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumOscillatorIII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
Friction acts on a block moving down a slope by opposing the relative motion of surfaces in contact, with its direction determined by the overall relative velocity. The solution assumes a constant downslope velocity, leading to a specific angle of friction relative to the horizontal. Initially, when the block starts from rest, all relative velocity is lateral, resulting in no friction opposing the descent. As the block accelerates down the slope, a portion of the frictional force begins to act up the slope. If the downward gravitational force exceeds the maximum frictional force, the dynamics change significantly, potentially invalidating the original solution.
QuantumOscillatorIII
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary: How friction acts on a block moving down a slope moving side to side

I found this problem, and I've also attached its solution. My question is, if the block wants to move down the slope, and also wants to move side to side and follow the movement of the plane - where does friction act? Since the total friction force is max $ \mu * mg * \cos (\theta) $ part of that will act against gravity, the other part against the side-to-side movement of the plane. The solution says that the part that will act against gravity will be equal to the downward gravitational force - but isn't this a wild assumption? Also, what happens if the downward gravitational force is greater than $ \mu * mg * \cos (\theta) $? Does the solution fall apart then?

Screenshot 2024-07-19 at 21.07.10.png



Screenshot 2024-07-19 at 21.07.20.png


Screenshot 2024-07-19 at 21.07.25.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
QuantumOscillatorIII said:
My question is, if the block wants to move down the slope, and also wants to move side to side and follow the movement of the plane - where does friction act? Since the total friction force is max ## \mu * mg * \cos (\theta) ## part of that will act against gravity, the other part against the side-to-side movement of the plane.
Friction acts to oppose relative motion of surfaces in contact.
The solution assumes constant downslope velocity, ##w##. Because the block barely has time to acquire any lateral velocity, the relative velocity in that direction is always ##v##.
The overall relative velocity is therefore at angle ##arctan(w/v)## to the horizontal, and that is the direction in which friction will act.
QuantumOscillatorIII said:
The solution says that the part that will act against gravity will be equal to the downward gravitational force - but isn't this a wild assumption?
That comes from the assumption of constant downslope velocity.
Ignore the small lateral velocity the block acquires and consider the block starting from rest. At first, all the relative velocity is lateral, so no friction opposes the descent. The block accelerates down the slope, but as it does so an increasing fraction of the frictional force will point up the slope. So, provided ##\mu>\tan(\alpha)##, there is a limiting downslope speed.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and QuantumOscillatorIII
haruspex said:
Friction acts to oppose relative motion of surfaces in contact.
The solution assumes constant downslope velocity, ##w##. Because the block barely has time to acquire any lateral velocity, the relative velocity in that direction is always ##v##.
The overall relative velocity is therefore at angle ##arctan(w/v)## to the horizontal, and that is the direction in which friction will act.

That comes from the assumption of constant downslope velocity.
Ignore the small lateral velocity the block acquires and consider the block starting from rest. At first, all the relative velocity is lateral, so no friction opposes the descent. The block accelerates down the slope, but as it does so an increasing fraction of the frictional force will point up the slope. So, provided ##\mu>\tan(\alpha)##, there is a limiting downslope speed.
Got it, thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top