How Is Energy Transformed in a Satellite's Decaying Orbit Due to Air Friction?

AI Thread Summary
A 500-kg satellite in a 500 km orbit experiences energy transformation due to air friction as it descends to Earth, impacting at 2.00 km/s. The total energy of the satellite is calculated to be approximately -1.45 x 10^10 J, while the kinetic energy before impact is 1 x 10^9 J. The energy loss due to friction is estimated at 1.55 x 10^9 J, but the expected answer is 1.58 x 10^9 J. The discussion highlights the necessity of accounting for potential energy changes during descent, as potential energy continuously converts to kinetic energy. Understanding these energy transformations is crucial for accurate calculations in orbital mechanics.
Zynoakib
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 500-kg satellite is in a circular orbit at an altitude of
500 km above the Earth’s surface. Because of air friction,
the satellite eventually falls to the Earth’s surface,
where it hits the ground with a speed of 2.00 km/s. How
much energy was transformed into internal energy by
means of air friction?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Total Energy of satellite = PE = KE
= G(mass of satellite)(mass of Earth)/ - 2 (Earth's radius + orbit's height)
= -1.45 x 10^10 J

KE before crash = 0.5 (500)(2000)^2 = 1 x 10^9 J

Energy loss due to friction

- 1.45 x 10^10 - 1 x 10^9 = 1.55 x 10^9 J

But the answer is 1.58 x 10^9 J, what is missing?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you account for all the energy? What about the potential energy change from orbit to surface?
 
gneill said:
Did you account for all the energy? What about the potential energy change from orbit to surface?

Why do I need to include PE change? Shouldn't all the PE energy be converted to KE right before it crashes? So the PE change will be included into KE.
 
Zynoakib said:
Why do I need to include PE change? Shouldn't all the PE energy be converted to KE right before it crashes? So the PE change will be included into KE.
PE will be changed to KE continuously as the object changes its radial position. The KE it gains as a result must figure into what remains at the end of its journey.

Suppose we consider a slightly different situation. Suppose an object with the same mass as the satellite is momentarily stationary above the surface at the same height as the satellite orbit and falls straight down to the surface. Ignoring air friction, what will be its KE and velocity at impact? Where did that KE come from? It's initial orbital KE was zero...
 
  • Like
Likes Zynoakib
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top