How Is Kinetic Friction Calculated for a Skier on a Horizontal Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Intrusionv2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a skier who slows down on a horizontal surface after skiing down an icy slope. The skier's initial speed at the bottom of the slope was calculated correctly, but there was confusion regarding the forces acting on the skier while decelerating. The key point is that only horizontal forces, specifically friction, are responsible for slowing the skier down, as the skier's weight does not contribute to horizontal motion. The correct calculation for the coefficient of kinetic friction was derived as approximately 0.2017. This highlights the importance of considering only the relevant forces in horizontal motion when solving such problems.
Intrusionv2
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A skier with a mass of 53 kg starts from rest and skis down an icy (frictionless) slope that has a length of 59 m at an angle of 32° with respect to the horizontal. At the bottom of the slope, the path levels out and becomes horizontal, the snow becomes less icy, and the skier begins to slow down, coming to rest in a distance of 155 m along the horizontal path.

(a) What is the speed of the skier at the bottom of the slope?
(b) What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the skier and the horizontal surface?

I just need help with (b)

Homework Equations



Vf2 - Vi2 = 2ay
fk = uk*N

The Attempt at a Solution



Don't need help with (a) but I'll list what I did anyway...

(a) What is the speed of the skier at the bottom of the slope?

Got the height first.

-->sin32 = y/59

Vi = 0m/s
-->Vf2 = 2ay
-->Vf2 = 2*-9.8m/s2*-31.265m
-->Vf = 24.755 m/s(b)

Vi = 24.755m/s
Vf = 0m/s
x = 155m

-->Vf2-Vi2 = 2*a*x
-->0 - 24.7552 = 2*a*155m
-->a = -1.9768m/s2

-->F - Fk = ma
-->mg - ukN = ma
-->mg - ukmg = ma
-->g - ukg = a
-->uk = (g-a) / g
-->uk = (-9.8m/s2 - (-1.9768m/s2)) / (-9.8m/s2)
-->uk = 0.7983

Somehow this is wrong? Any help is much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The speed you calculated in part (a) is incorrect. First the vertical component of acceleration is not -9.8 (the skier isn't in free fall, there are forces pushing up on him as well as pulling down). Second, you only considered the vertical speed of the skier and completely neglected the horizontal speed.

The speed you want is the magnitude of the velocity that is parallel to the ski slope, since once he reaches the bottom all that velocity will be redirected horizontally.

Start by drawing a free body diagram for the skier. Then find the components of each force that is parallel to the ski slope. Use those components in Newtons 2nd law to find the acceleration.It would be easier to use energy, but I'm assuming you haven't learned that in class yet.
 
Actually, it is correct as I checked the answer. I'm guessing they just want the y-component. We haven't learned energy yet but I went ahead and looked it up and got the same answer using the potential energy to get the KE at the bottom.

Only (b) is incorrect.
 
lol, you're right, the speed is correct. I didn't even bother to calculate the speed or look at part b, once I saw your equation. You got lucky there actually because the reasoning is still incorrect, It just happens to work out to the same as the energy equation, but like i said it appears to be blind luck.

Anyway, in part B, only horizontal forces are slowing him down. The only horizontal force acting on the skier is friction. The skiers weight has no horizontal component.
 
Ahhh, I see now. Thanks! I was compensating for the vertical forces as well.

For those who are reading this thread in the future, the coefficient of kinetic friction between the skier and the horizontal surface is just:

-->Fk = ma
-->ukN = ma
-->ukg = a
-->uk = a/g
-->uk = -1.9768m/s2 / -9.8m/s2 = 0.2017
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top