How is spin rotation measured?

gespex
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

In the following article I found through google, they explain how spin is measured:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Why-Is-Quantum-Mechanics-So-Weird-40009.shtml

I understand how the Stern-Gerlach experiment works, but the article doesn't go into much detail about the next experiment where it describes the measurement of the spin being more than 360 degrees. They are talking about "rotating the external field", but what exactly does that mean? Does that mean a graduate bending of the magnetic field, such that halfway the north and south poles are reversed until the end where it is back to the starting magnetic field? Or is it done by some other method?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Softpedia doesn't explain it very well. The point of Rabi's experiment was to accurately measure the magnetic moment. He had a Stern-Gerlach magnet which separated the spins followed by a second one to bring them back together. In between he subjected both beams to a rotating magnetic field with frequency ω. When ω was just the right frequency to cause a spin flip, the beams would fail to get all the way through.
 
Okay thanks for your answer. But what exactly is a rotating magnetic field in this context? Does it literally just mean a magnet whose north and south pole make a 360-degree rotation at a high speed, making a circle around the actual magnetic field?
 
If I have a strong Magnetic field B0 in the z direction then any atoms inside will have their magnetic dipoles align in the z direction, but will rotate in the x-y plane at a larmor frequency ω. Because the dipoles are rotating in the x-y plane with a frequency ω, you will need to apply a not as strong B1 field that is rotating at the same frequency ω for a short time to tip (flip) the dipole some small angle.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top