How Is the Particle Density Operator Defined?

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
There is something I do not understand. One way to define the current density operator is through the particle density operator Ï(r). From the fundamental interpretation of the wavefunction we have:

Ï(r)= lψ(r)l2

But my book takes this a step further by rewriting the equality above:

lψ(r)l2 = ∫dr' ψ*(r')δ(r-r')ψ(r')

And thus identifies the particle density operator as the delta function above. How does this make sense in any way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We have <r|Ï|r> = ∫dr' ψ*(r')δ(r-r')ψ(r')
where do you see a possible identification?
|ψ(r)|² is found on the diagonal of rho not on delta.
 
In general, we write expectation of operator A as ##\displaystyle \langle \psi |A|\psi \rangle = \int \psi^*(r') A \psi(r') dr'##. Substituting ##A = \delta(r-r')## gives you the correct expression for expectation of ##\rho(r)##. So what's the problem?
 
Yes but
<r|ψ><ψ|r'> = <r|Ï|r'> is not identified to δ(r-r') like aaa202 said.
it is not here an average value but an element of a density matrix.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top