How Long Does It Take for a Particle on a String to Move Through 1.0 km?

AI Thread Summary
A wave traveling through a string at 450 m/s with a wavelength of 0.18 m and an amplitude of 2.0 mm raises the question of how long it takes for a particle on the string to move through 1.0 km. The initial calculation of 2.22 seconds was incorrect, as it conflated the wave's speed with the particle's motion. Understanding that the particles of the string oscillate vertically while the wave moves horizontally clarifies the relationship between amplitude, frequency, and the time taken. The correct time for a particle to move through this distance is 5.0 seconds. This distinction between wave motion and particle motion is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
hartfan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wave is moving through a string at 450 m/s. The wavelength is 0.18 m and the amplitude is 2.0 mm. What is the time required for a particle on the string to move through 1.0 km? (The answer given is 5.0x10 s).


Homework Equations


The only equations I can think of are the ones relating frequency, period, wave speed and wavelength, where wave speed = wave length x frequency. The period is the inverse of frequency.


The Attempt at a Solution


If I divided the 1.0 km by the wave speed, I get 2.22 s. I don't know how else the 1.0 km is related to anything else, and can't figure out how the amplitude has to do with anything. How do you even find the function of the wave? This has been bothering me for almost a week now and I've been looking up every physics text I can find in the library and none of them could offer me a solution. Please help. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't mix up the motion of the wave itself--governed by that speed = wave length X frequency formula--with the motion of the particles of the string. The wave moves along the string, but which way do the particles of the string move? That's where the amplitude (and the frequency) comes in.
 
Doc Al said:
Don't mix up the motion of the wave itself--governed by that speed = wave length X frequency formula--with the motion of the particles of the string. The wave moves along the string, but which way do the particles of the string move? That's where the amplitude (and the frequency) comes in.

Wow. I finally get it now. Thanks for the brilliant tip. I don't know why I never thought of it that way before.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top