How many ways can you arrange 7 students with specific groupings in a line?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the arrangement of 7 students with specific groupings, treat the two Americans as one unit and the three Indians as another unit, resulting in four units total. The four units can be arranged in 4! (24) ways. Additionally, the two Americans can be arranged among themselves in 2! (2) ways, and the three Indians can be arranged in 3! (6) ways. Therefore, the total number of arrangements is calculated as 4! × 2! × 3! = 288 ways. This method can also be applied if there were only one American and one Indian, simplifying the problem further.
hari_299
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
[/B

I have a question here. Please can someone solve this. The question is:
There are 7 students of whom 2 are Americans, 2 are Russians and 3 Indians. hey have to stand in a line so that the two Americans are always together and the three Indians are always together. In how many ways can this be done??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there were only one American and one Indian, could you solve this problem?
 
In other words, treat the two Americans and the three Indians as being single persons. Once you know how many ways you can line up those "4 people", think about how many new ways you could get by interchanging the Americans only or interchanging the Indians only.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top