MHB How much do 3 televisions cost?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnx1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The total cost of 2 televisions and 5 washing machines is $7215, with each washing machine costing $216 less than a television. To solve for the cost of 3 televisions, the equations 2x + 5y = 7215 and x - y = 216 are established, where x is the cost of a television and y is the cost of a washing machine. Substituting y in the first equation leads to a solvable system. This method simplifies the problem and clarifies the relationships between the costs. Understanding these equations is crucial for determining the total cost of 3 televisions.
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
The total cost of 2 similar televisions and 5 similar washing machines is \$7215. Each washing machine costs \$216 less than a television. How much do 3 televisions cost?my answer:
2 television + 5 washing machines = 7215but I got stuck there. However I dd look at how to do it, but I'm not 100% sure why they subtracted 432 from 7215. Is there a better algebraic expression that I have on top?

Unless it's: 2 television + 5 washing machines + 432 = 7215?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey!

So what you are supposed to be thinking about in this problem is the "unknowns". What is the question? "How much do 3 televisions cost?" We know how many of each we are buying but we do not know what they cost.

"my answer: 2 television + 5 washing machines = 7215"

You are going in the right direction, but what you want to say is,

(2 televisions)(the cost of a television) + (5 washing machines)(the cost of a washing machine) = 7215

It will be much easier to rename these costs as variables. Let,

x = the cost of a television
y = the cost of a washing machine

Now we have a better looking equation.

2x + 5y = 7215

Now, to solve a system of equations using elimination (or substitution) we are going to need another equation! What else does the problem tell you?

"Each washing machine costs $216 less than a television."

Let's rewrite this using our variables.

the cost of a television - the cost of a washing machine = 216

or

x - y = 216

Awesome! Now we have two equations! So our system of equations is...

2x + 5y = 7215
x - y = 216


Try solving the system using the method of elimination or substitution.
 
Let "W" be the cost of a single washing machine and let "T" be the cost of a single television set.

"The total cost of 2 similar televisions and 5 similar washing machines is 7215".
So 2T+ 5W= 7215.

That is what you have though I think it is simpler, and less error prone, to use single letters rather than full words (clearly stating what those letters represent). This is a single equation in two unknowns so we need another equation in order to solve for specific values of T and W.

"Each washing machine costs $216 less than a television." This is our second equation:
W= T- 216.

You want to solve 2T+ 5W= 7215 and W= T- 216. The obvious thing to do is to replace W in the first equation by T- 216: 2T+ 5(T- 216)= 7215.
 
I'll keep in mind to write it in single variables. Thank you to everyone for showing a clear way to do it.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top