B How Much Energy is Stored in Earth's Magnetic Field?

AI Thread Summary
Creating a magnetic field as strong as Earth's would require a significant amount of energy, but the exact power needed depends on the method of generation. Maintaining a magnetic field with electromagnets requires power, while a static magnetic field does not. The energy stored in Earth's magnetic field can be estimated using its magnetic strength and volume, yielding a rough figure of around 10^21 joules, though this estimate is highly approximate. To generate this amount of energy, the total power generation capacity of the world, approximately one terawatt, would need to be sustained for centuries. Additionally, the infrastructure required for such a project, particularly for cooling superconductors, would greatly increase the energy demands.
Mikael17
Messages
43
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
Earth's magnetic field
How much power (Megawatts) would it require if we were to create a magnetic field as large and strong as the Earth's magnetic field?. I haven't learned how to calculate this, but just curious.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
These aren't even the right units. A watt is a unit of power. That's like asking how many megawatts it takes to get from New York to Las Vegas.
 
That's the wrong question to ask. It takes zero power to maintain a magnetic field, although if you are using an electromagnet and aren't using superconductors it takes power to maintain the current. So the answer to the power requirement is between zero and absolutely enormous, depending on how you build your solenoid.

The question you probably want to ask is about energy. How much energy is stored in the Earth's magnetic field? Unfortunately, I don't know the answer. The energy density of a magnetic field of strength ##B## in a volume with magnetic permeability ##\mu\mu_0## is ##B^2/2\mu\mu_0##, but to get the total energy you need to integrate that over the whole volume of the field, and I don't know how ##B## varies. It's about 50 micro Tesla at Earth's surface and the magnetosphere extends to about 100,000km on the day side. It's much longer on the night side, but much weaker too. And I've no idea how it varies inside the Earth.

Finger in the wind, try a sphere of radius 100,000km and a B field of 50 micro Tesla with ##\mu=1##. ##\mu_0\approx 10^{-6}\mathrm{H/m}##. That'll come out on the order ##10^{21}\mathrm{J}##.

There are so many approximations there that I wouldn't really trust the number. However, note that the total power generation capacity of the world is on the order of a terrawatt. You'd need all of that for a few centuries to generate ##10^{21}\mathrm{J}##. So even if my estimate is off by a few orders of magnitude, it's more energy than is readily available. And we haven't even discussed the infrastructure needed to generate a field like that - the cooling capacity for superconductors the size of the Earth would increase the energy budget many, many times.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top