How much power is needed to ride a conveyor belt into space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Emanresu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Time
AI Thread Summary
A frictionless conveyor belt into space requires minimal power to lift a person, with a force of approximately 1000N needed to counteract gravity, resulting in a power requirement of just 1kW at a speed of 1m/s. Space elevators are highlighted as an efficient and environmentally friendly method for transporting cargo to orbit, potentially generating power if more mass descends than ascends. However, the challenge lies in accelerating the entire ribbon of the elevator to the necessary speed, as the energy required for this is significant compared to lifting cargo. While reaching low Earth orbit is feasible, achieving geostationary orbit would take an impractical amount of time, approximately 1.3 years. Overall, the concept presents an intriguing but complex method for space travel.
Emanresu
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Suppose you have a frictionless and perfectly balanced conveyor belt going into space (and back). The belt is driven by a motor on earth. Suppose you want to send a person who weighs 100kg into space and you boost them onto the conveyor belt at 1m/s with the conveyor belt running at 1m/s (the boost is independant of the conveyor belt so it does not have to accelerate them). To maintain that velocity of 1m/s requires a force opposite to that of gravity which is approx. 1000N. Because Power = Fv does that mean that the motor must only generate a power of 1KW (1000N x 1m/s) ? i.e. with this configuration you can get into space with very little power if you are prepared to go slowly enough ?

E.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes the power doesn't depend on the height only the speed.
You are lifiting 100Kg ( 1000N) through 1m every second so it takes just 1kW.
Exactly the same as it would take you to run up stairs at 1 (vertical)m/s.

Space elevators are a very fuel efficent way of getting into space. If you have more mass coming down than going up they atually generate power!
 
Yep. The mass in question only takes 1KW.

Space elevators are one of the more efficient and "green" methods for getting cargo to and from orbit.

The real trick is in getting the elevator to work in the first place vis-a-vis accelerating the mass of the entire ribbon up to the 1m/s traveling speed. The amount of energy it takes to lift cargo is trivial compared to the amount of kinetic energy tied up in the ribbon itself.
 
You could get into space this way pretty easily, but getting into orbit would be a lot tougher. Just riding it to low Earth orbit altitude (about 200 km) doesn't accomplish you anything. Getting to geostationary orbit, iirc, is about 40,000 km up, so you'd have to ride this conveyor for 1.3 years to get there. So pack a hearty lunch.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top