How much torque would be on the motor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Temeraire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motor Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the torque requirements for a DC motor intended to assist in moving a human arm at the elbow. Calculations indicate that a torque of approximately 5.89 Nm is needed when the forearm is parallel to the ground, which translates to about 60 kg.cm. The recommended motor, with a load torque of only 0.55 kg.cm, is deemed insufficient for this application, suggesting the necessity for a gearbox to increase torque. Additionally, considerations for power output and speed are crucial, as a motor with adequate torque may still be slow without a suitable gearbox. Ultimately, a motor and gearbox combination that meets the torque requirement of 6 Nm is essential for the project’s success.
Temeraire
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I would like to make a project where a dc motor will help the movement of a human arm. The motor will be at the elbow, the stationary part will be attached to the upper arm, and the moving part will be attached to the forearm, so the motor will help to rotate the forearm at the elbow.

I think the biggest torque will be when the forearm is parallel with the ground, so my calculation is something like this:
My forearm+hand+a little weight(aluminium structure, etc): m=3kg.
Gravitational acceleration: g=9.81 m/s2
The arm is a distributed load, for now let's say it is evenly distributed and the center mass is at halfway of the forearm: from the elbow it's s=20 cm=0.2m

So the Torque would be: T=3*9.81*0.2=5.89Nm.
Or going with the kg.cm: 60kg.cm.

I got a recommendation to choose a motor, for example this: https://media.digikey.com/pdf/Data%20Sheets/Seeed%20Technology/108990007_Web.pdf
But it says that the load torque is 0.55 kg.cm, so if my calculations are correct i would need hundred times more torque, which seems odd to me.

do you have any idea what i am missing, or calculating wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you want to use that motor you'll need a gearbox, the motor's torque without the gearbox is just a piece of the puzzle. The alternative would be to use a direct-drive DC brushless motor with the rated torque but that might require higher-cost components.
 
  • Like
Likes Temeraire
Mech_Engineer said:
If you want to use that motor you'll need a gearbox, the motor's torque without the gearbox is just a piece of the puzzle. The alternative would be to use a direct-drive DC brushless motor with the rated torque but that might require higher-cost components.
The motor itself has a built in gearbox with a worm gear (i will attach a picture). Could it be that they mean the dc motor's shaft's load torque by the 0.55 kg.cm without the gearbox? So with the gearbox it becomes much larger?
 

Attachments

  • gearbox.jpg
    gearbox.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 347
Temeraire said:
I think the biggest torque will be when the forearm is parallel with the ground, so my calculation is something like this:
My forearm+hand+a little weight(aluminium structure, etc): m=3kg.
Gravitational acceleration: g=9.81 m/s2
The arm is a distributed load, for now let's say it is evenly distributed and the center mass is at halfway of the forearm: from the elbow it's s=20 cm=0.2m

So the Torque would be: T=3*9.81*0.2=5.89Nm.
Or going with the kg.cm: 60kg.cm.
Do you want this arm to do anything besides moving? Lift an object, for example...?
 
russ_watters said:
Do you want this arm to do anything besides moving? Lift an object, for example...?
I would be more than happy if in the first round i could make it work with just the arm (without any external object to lift).
 
The motor you've shown is way undersized for the requirements you've stated, I recommend doing some more searching to find a motor/gearbox combination which provides the torque specification of 6 N-m.

You'll also need to consider expected power output and speed- you may be able to find a small motor with large reduction gearbox that meets the torque requirements, but would take minutes to move 90 degrees. You're going to need a motor with a combination of enough torque and reasonable speed/power output for your application.
 
  • Like
Likes Temeraire
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top