How should I approach this (coordinate transformation) problem?

[Swulf]

I am starting to deal with optomechanical systems as part of my work, and am faced with what seems to be an uncomplicated problem, however I'm ashamed to admit that I am having great difficulty getting to grips with it. I'd like some pointers and/or advice as to how to go about solving these sorts of problems - please note, I want to *learn how to solve them*, I am not just looking for the 'answer'. It's the methods and approaches I want to understand so I can apply it to subsequent problems.

The system I am considering has a flat mirror with axis X, Y and Z as shown. Translations in the axial directions are allowed i.e. \delta X, \delta Y and \delta Z. Rotations about the axes are also allowed, \theta_X, \theta_Y and \theta_Z.

The articulated mirror assembly is to sit on another stage which can rotate by an angle \phi_R and can tilt the entire mirror by \phi_T. Obviously \theta_X = \phi_T. The whole thing is intended to steer an incoming beam onto a surface by controlling \phi_R and \phi_T (i.e. \theta_X).

My difficulty in comprehension is how to determine the relationship between \theta_Y and \phi_R. The system will not be able to move in \theta_Y, only in \phi_R, but some specifications on error have been given in terms of \theta_Y and it is necessary to turn those into corresponding specifications on \phi_R. I am stumped as to how to properly transform between the two. It seems like it should be simple!

I would welcome any advice on how to properly determine the relationship between \theta_Y and \phi_R.

Thank you,

Swulf

 

[Stephen Tashi]

. Obviously \theta_X = \phi_T.

I don't see that. If there is a rotation about the z-axis, the x-axis wil move. So it may no longer cooincide with the axis that the tilt is turning about.

The type of transformations you describe can written as the product of matrices. The order in which the transformations are applied will matter. You can't describe a a unique transformation just by giving the values of rotation angles and the translations because it matters which transformation is done first. If you have equipment that is simultaeneously making the rotations about several axes, I'll boldy say that this also can be handled - athough I haven't tried to this myself.

 

[Swulf]

Hi Stephen,

Thanks for replying!

I think I should have said that the \phi_T angle is always about the X axis that is defined on the mirror. So therefore it is the same angle; it is only defined as \phi_T to give it similar nomenclature to \phi_Z.

I'm having trouble, though, seeing what the first step would be in constructing a transformation between a rotation about \theta_Y and a rotation about \phi_Z. I guess I don't fundamentally understand the problem at all well... am I to start by considering how a point in the X, Y, Z coordinate system moves when subjected to a rotation about Y, and then somehow map that into the coordinate system associated with \phi_Z, \phi_T? I'm lost.

 

[Stephen Tashi]

We need a better definition of what you are trying to accomplish. As I said, the values of the various angles and translations you listed do not define a specific transformation, so you must pick some order for them to be applied or you must say that you are trying to deal with a control system where all of them change simultaneously.

There is some ambiguity in your definitions of values. For example, if I perform the rotation \theta_z then perform the rotation \theta_x, what axis do I use for the \theta_x rotation? Do I used the current position of the x-axis where it landed after the rotation about the z-axis or do I use the original position of the x-axis before the rotation about the z-axis?

It sounds like what you are doing is similar to the problem of determining the coordinates of the wingtip of an aircraft given information about roll, pitch and yaw.