How Small Can Mirrors Reflect in Recursive Reflection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter -Job-
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirrors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of recursive reflection between two mirrors and the limits of image recognition at microscopic levels. It argues that as one zooms into a mirror, the image would degrade significantly rather than maintain clarity, as a single spot the size of a wavelength cannot encapsulate a full reflective image. The conversation also explores the implications of viewing angles and the use of semi-silvered mirrors, which lose brightness with each reflection. Additionally, it touches on the principles of optical resonators and their applications in gas lasers, emphasizing that only specific frequencies can emerge from such setups. Overall, the feasibility of achieving clear recursive reflections at small scales is questioned.
-Job-
Science Advisor
Messages
1,152
Reaction score
4
If we have two mirrors, each one facing the other (producing what i'll describe as recursive reflection) then, supposing we could zoom into one of the mirrors as much as we'd like, then at what point would the image become unrecognizable. Would there be a microscopical-sized reflection of the other mirror? How small can/does it get?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Depending on how we choose to look at light, it would be as small as the wavelenght of light
 
Mattara said:
Depending on how we choose to look at light, it would be as small as the wavelenght of light

I disagree.
There is no way that a single spot as small as a wavelenghth of light could contain an entire picture of its reflective ancestory under that condition.
Most likely, there would be a serious degredation of resoultion or field of view, or both.
 
Uh, you'd wouildn't get recursion if you zoomed in. You'd get a close-up image of the device, camera or head of whom/what-ever is doing the viewing.

So there's only two ways this could be set up:
-if your view angle was oblique, but that means eventually, your light path will slip off the side of the mirror and you'll simply be viewing a really zoomed in image of the laboratory wall.
- you put the reflective surface *in front* of your viewer. Which means you use a semi-silvered mirror, which means every bounce of the light loses brightness, which means after a few bounces, there's no light left to get through.

I am not sure your experiment is possible even in principle.
 
Last edited:
If put two mirrors parallel (at about .5 meter) you have a Fabry-Perot optical resonator. If the distance is less (about .5 cm) you may have a filter.

This device has its own proper frequencies so if one of them is not all reflecting (such as 99% of reflecting) the radiation only emerges from the cave if its frequency is equal (approx.) to one of the proper frequencies of the resonator.

The common use is in gas laser such as Ar-Ne or CO2. You put an amplification media inside the cave, and if the maximum of gain is very close to one of the proper frecuencies of the cave (in other case the radiation will not be amplified) then, the radiation emerges amplified and you have a cool laser€ :D
 
At a separation near the wavelength of the initial light, I believe that significant tunneling of higher wavelengths and lower amplitude through the mirror (one dimensional box) would occur. I guess that the image resolution of this tunneled radiation to that of the initial image would vary approximately as the squared ratio between initial light frequency and tunneled light frequency.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
Thread 'How to model converging illumination through object plane (in ZEMAX)'
Hello community, I'm designing a projection lens system for a 35mm film projector in Zemax OpticStudio and struggling with the correct sequential mode setup for the illumination geometry. The light source is a Xenon short-arc lamp reflected by an ellipsoid mirror, which creates a converging cone with a 40.6 degree full angle that passes through the film gate. The film gate is my object plane, but the light doesn't diverge from it like a typical Lambertian source. Instead, the converging...
Back
Top