How to calculate the decimal power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NickTesla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the decimal power of (0.212765957)², the result is approximately 0.045269352458115849. The discussion highlights the importance of using a calculator for such calculations, especially when dealing with decimal bases and natural number exponents. It also clarifies the notation for expressing the decimal and exponent correctly. The conversation includes corrections to the exponent notation for clarity. Overall, using a calculator simplifies the process of calculating decimal powers.
NickTesla
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
(0,212765957)² = ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you want to know how to open the calculator on the device you were typing this?
And are you using a comma as separation sign for 0.2 = 1/5?
 
  • Like
Likes NickTesla
Thank you, the result is
0,045269352458115849
 
NickTesla said:
(0,212765957)² = ?
You may have already learned how. Your base is a decimal number and your exponent is a natural number.
(0.212765957)^2
(212765957*10^-9)^2
(212765957)^2*(10^(-18))
but really, the easier way as already said, use a calculator.******
(0.212765957)^2
(212765957*10^{-9})^2
(212765957)^2*(10^{-18}), that negative eighteen is supposed to be an exponent.
Mod note: Fixed the exponent.
symbolipoint note: Thanks, Mod; now I fixed the negative nine exponent also.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes NickTesla
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Back
Top