How to Calculate the Madelung Constant for an Octahedral Arrangement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abstracted6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the Madelung constant for an octahedral arrangement of doubly charged anions around a doubly charged cation, one must sum the Coulomb interactions between all ion pairs. The relevant equations include EA=-(Mke2)/r0 and α=2M/((n1+n2)|Z1Z2|), which relate energy to the Madelung constant. The coordination number for the arrangement is 6, indicating the number of nearest neighbors. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the application of these equations and the need for clarification on the textbook used. Understanding the summation of electrostatic interactions is crucial for accurately determining the Madelung constant.
abstracted6
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the Madelung constant for an octahedral arrangement of doubly charged anions about a doubly charged cation. Use r0 for the anion−cation distance. (Hint: Remember that the Madelung constant considers the sum of Coulomb interactions over all atom/ion pairs).


Homework Equations



Possibly helpful Equations
EA=-(Mke2)/r0

α=2M/((n1+n2)|Z1Z2|)

EA=-(ke2α(n1+n2(|Z1Z2)/2r0

The Attempt at a Solution



So we have a theoretical bond pair X+2Y-2 with a coordination number of 6.

I believe the next step should be to calculate EA, but I fail to see how to do that without α.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Madelung equation doesn't seem familiar to me, what textbook are you using?
 
Here is a screenshot of my professors notes I took these equations from.

Notes_zps8f083b95.jpg


This is our book:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521651514/?tag=pfamazon01-20

What equations would you have used?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
None of these. Madelung constant is calculated just by summing electrostatic interactions between ions.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top