How to convert a univariate distribution to bivariate distribution

AI Thread Summary
To convert a MARSHALL-OLKIN exponential Weibull distribution from univariate to bivariate, the joint PDF of two independent random variables can be obtained by multiplying their individual PDFs. The discussion emphasizes the need to define the relationship between the two variables, suggesting that one might consider a bivariate normal distribution for dependent variables. Key parameters such as lambda, beta, and alpha are identified as essential for defining the distribution, with alpha being noted as the location or shift parameter. The notation I(0, ∞) indicates the support of the distribution, which is relevant for defining the valid range of the random variable. Understanding these concepts is crucial for successfully creating the bivariate CDF from the given univariate distribution.
samrah
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi
i have MARSHAL-OLKIN exponential weibull distribution which have the following cdf and pdf..
how could i convert it to bivariate distribution?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The joint PDF of two independent random variables would just be the product of the two individual PDFs.
 
  • Like
Likes samrah
FactChecker said:
The joint PDF of two independent random variables would just be the product of the two individual PDFs.
thanks.. i have cdf and pdf (latex codes are given)..how can i make bivariate cdf from this univariate? what is shift parameter in this case? kindly guide me

thanks alot

\begin{align} \label{A5}
F(x) &= \frac{1- e^{-\left(\lambda\, x+\beta\, x^k\right)}}{1-(1-\alpha)\,
e^{-\left(\lambda\, x+\beta\, x^k\right)}}\cdot \boldsymbol I_{(0, \infty)}(x)\,,\\ \label{A6}
f(x) &= \frac{\alpha\,\left(\lambda+ \beta \,k\,x^{k-1}\right)\, e^{-\lambda\,x-\beta\,x^k}}
{\left(1-(1-\alpha )\, e^{-\left(\lambda\, x+\beta\, x^k\right)}\right)^2} \cdot \boldsymbol I_{(0, \infty)}(x)\,,
\qquad \lambda, \beta, k, \alpha > 0 \,;
\end{align}
 
You need to decide how you want the two variables to be related. It's easy to determine the joint PDF if they are independent -- just multiply them. Alternatively, you may want to mimic the bivariate normal, where the X and Y variables are not independent, but the vector distance from a center point (mean) is in the same class of distributions of the original distribution. For that, you may want to look at how the two coordinate vectors are related in a bivariate normal (see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BivariateNormalDistribution.html )

PS. My description of the bivariate normal in terms of a vector "distance" is a loose description, not to be taken literally.
 
  • Like
Likes samrah
samrah said:
thanks.. i have cdf and pdf (latex codes are given)..how can i make bivariate cdf from this univariate? what is shift parameter in this case? kindly guide me

thanks alot

\begin{align} \label{A5}
F(x) &= \frac{1- e^{-\left(\lambda\, x+\beta\, x^k\right)}}{1-(1-\alpha)\,
e^{-\left(\lambda\, x+\beta\, x^k\right)}}\cdot \boldsymbol I_{(0, \infty)}(x)\,,\\ \label{A6}
f(x) &= \frac{\alpha\,\left(\lambda+ \beta \,k\,x^{k-1}\right)\, e^{-\lambda\,x-\beta\,x^k}}
{\left(1-(1-\alpha )\, e^{-\left(\lambda\, x+\beta\, x^k\right)}\right)^2} \cdot \boldsymbol I_{(0, \infty)}(x)\,,
\qquad \lambda, \beta, k, \alpha > 0 \,;
\end{align}
what is lambda, Beta, alpha, what is I(0, inf) is k the other variable with x. Is this an advanced question, what's I(0,inf)?
 
  • Like
Likes samrah
Josh S Thompson said:
what is lambda, Beta, alpha, what is I(0, inf) is k the other variable with x. Is this an advanced question, what's I(0,inf)?
alpha,beta ,lambda and gamma are just parameters... i have to fix three and vary one of them (the location or shift parameter)... i found that alpha is the location parameter...now i have to write these in product form with same this pdf ,beta,lambda and gamma will be fixed and alpha will vary.i don't know about (0,inf)
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top