How to derive coefficient of friction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the coefficient of static friction (μ_s) for a box at rest on an inclined plane at the critical angle. The correct formula is μ_s = tan(θ), as μ_s is dimensionless and cannot equal mgtan(θ). Participants emphasize the importance of drawing a free body diagram to visualize the forces at play, particularly in the limiting case where the box remains stationary. The gravitational force components are analyzed, leading to the conclusion that the teacher's reference to mgtan(θ) is incorrect. Overall, the key takeaway is that μ_s should be derived as tan(θ) for the scenario described.
Meteo
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have a box at rest on a plane raised to the critical angle.

I need to derive the formula \mu_s=mgtan(\theta)
I know f_s/n=\mu
n=f_y=mgcos(\theta)
f_s=f_x=mgsin(\theta)

This leaves me with tan(\theta)=\mu cause the mg cancel out... what did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Meteo said:
I have a box at rest on a plane raised to the critical angle.

I need to derive the formula \mu_s=mgtan(\theta)
I know f_s/n=\mu
n=f_y=mgcos(\theta)
f_s=f_x=mgsin(\theta)

This leaves me with tan(\theta)=\mu cause the mg cancel out... what did I do wrong?
\mu_s is dimensionless so it cannot be equal to mgtan\theta. Your answer is correct.

AM
 
\mu_s=tan(\theta)
is what you are looking for

Draw a free body diagram.
This is only in the limiting case that it is the maximum \mu_x which will let the body rest on the incline of such an angle without sliding. So in this case you can use Friction=F_n*\mu
And set that equal to the component of the gravitational force pointing down the incline
 
Yes, that's what I managed to get. I think the mgtan(\theta) must be a mistake the teacher made since \mu cannot equal mgtan(\theta) because its dimensionless as AM said.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top