B How to derive the 4 laws of motion using Calculus

B
Thread starter MrDarkness
Start date Sunday, 5:11 AM
Tags

Newton equations

AI Thread Summary

The laws of motion cannot be derived purely from calculus, as they are fundamentally physical laws based on empirical observation and experimentation. While calculus can be used to express and develop these laws mathematically, their origins lie in physical principles rather than mathematical foundations. The formulation of these laws requires postulation based on real-world phenomena. Therefore, understanding the laws of motion involves both mathematical representation and physical experimentation. Ultimately, the relationship between calculus and the laws of motion is one of application rather than derivation.

Sunday, 5:11 AM

MrDarkness

How do you derive the laws of motion using Calculus from scratch

Physics news on Phys.org

Sunday, 5:18 AM

PeroK

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Insights Author

Gold Member

2024 Award

You can't. The laws of motion are physical laws, independent of the foundations of mathematics. The laws can be stated in mathematical form and developed using mathematics, such as calculus.

But, they have to be postulated through observation and experiment.

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/

View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

View full post »