B How to derive the 4 laws of motion using Calculus

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter MrDarkness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Newton equations
AI Thread Summary
The laws of motion cannot be derived purely from calculus, as they are fundamentally physical laws based on empirical observation and experimentation. While calculus can be used to express and develop these laws mathematically, their origins lie in physical principles rather than mathematical foundations. The formulation of these laws requires postulation based on real-world phenomena. Therefore, understanding the laws of motion involves both mathematical representation and physical experimentation. Ultimately, the relationship between calculus and the laws of motion is one of application rather than derivation.
MrDarkness
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do you derive the laws of motion using Calculus from scratch
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't. The laws of motion are physical laws, independent of the foundations of mathematics. The laws can be stated in mathematical form and developed using mathematics, such as calculus.

But, they have to be postulated through observation and experiment.
 

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Using reference frames for derivation of Lagrangian
Replies
25
Views
3K
I Extending Newton's laws -- Is the concept of force still defined?
Replies
35
Views
5K
B Is Newton's first law of motion applicable when walking?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Help with deriving the formula for kinetic energy (using calculus)
Replies
8
Views
5K
Derivation of orbital velocity formula
Replies
10
Views
15K
B Are frictional forces action forces or reaction forces?
Replies
14
Views
1K
B Understanding Average Velocity in Linear Motion with Constant Acceleration
Replies
1
Views
1K
Angular Velocity in Simple Harmonic Motion
Replies
11
Views
15K
I Sound pressure and inverse distance law
Replies
5
Views
2K
Is Newton's Law of Gravity Still Accurate Despite Einstein's Discoveries?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top