How to Derive the Expression for \(\delta W = -E dP\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter appmathstudent
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the expression \(\delta W = -E dP\) in the context of work done when changing the electric field \(E\) in a dielectric slab. The initial equations relate energy \(W\) to charge \(q\), capacitance \(C\), and electric field \(E\). The participant seeks to eliminate the factor of 2 in the denominator to achieve the desired expression. It is clarified that during the charging process, the charge \(q\) changes while the distance \(d\) remains constant, leading to the conclusion that \(dP\) can be expressed as \(d(dq)\). The conversation emphasizes the relationship between changes in charge and electric field in the context of work done.
appmathstudent
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
This is exercise 3-12 form Sears and Salinger Thermodynamics : Show that $$\delta W = -E dP$$ by calculating the work necessary to charge a parallel plate capacitor containing a dielectric.
Relevant Equations
$$W = U = \frac{q^2}{2C}$$
$$ C = \frac{\kappa \epsilon_0 A}{d}$$
$$P = qd $$ (dipole moment of slab)
$$ E = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0 \kappa A}$$
$$W = U = \frac{q^2}{2C} =\frac{q q d}{2 \kappa \epsilon_0 A} = \frac{E P}{2}$$

Then , since E is constant we have that :

$$\delta W = \frac{dW}{dP} dP = \frac{E}{2} dP$$.

My question is how can I make this 2 on the denominator disappear in order to obtain the required expression ?

ps : In the book (Chapter 3 page 67) he mentions that $$\delta W$$ is the work when $$E$$ is changed in a dielectric slab.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dP=d(qD)=(dq) D+ q (dD)
where D is distance between the capacitor plates introduced to distinguish it with differential d.
Which is your case changing charge or changing distance or the both ?
 
Last edited:
I think q is changing, since the work is done to change E.
 

Attachments

  • 20211002_125815.jpg
    20211002_125815.jpg
    30 KB · Views: 167
appmathstudent said:
I think q is changing, since the work is done to change E.
So you are saying E is not constant during the charging process.
 
appmathstudent said:
I think q is changing, since the work is done to change E.
q is changing, d is constant so
dP=d(dq)
\frac{dW}{dP}=\frac{1}{d}\frac{dW}{dq}
Try it.
 
  • Like
Likes appmathstudent
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top