How to Derive the Hydrogen Atom Hamiltonian in Spherical Coordinates?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Hamiltonian for a Hydrogen atom in spherical coordinates, starting from its Cartesian form. The correct Hamiltonian includes terms for the kinetic energy of both the proton and electron, as well as the potential energy due to their electrostatic interaction. It is emphasized that the variable 'r' should represent the separation between the proton and electron, not the distance from the origin. Participants suggest using online resources to find detailed derivations of the Laplacian in spherical coordinates. The conversation concludes with a request for clarification on search terms used to find relevant information.
FloridaGators
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
The Hamiltonian for a Hydrogen atom in Cartesian Coordinates (is this right?):
\hat{H} = - \frac{\bar{h}^2}{2m_p}\nabla ^2_p - \frac{\bar{h}^2}{2m_e}\nabla ^2_e - \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon _0r}
In Spherical Coordinates do I just use:
x=r sin θ cos φ, y = r sin θ sin φ, and z = r cos θ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is \hbar instead of h. But that is essentially correct. You might want to convert it to the center of mass reference frame before you do any work on it though. There are tons of sites out there that solve it as well and show all the work.
 
FloridaGators said:
The Hamiltonian for a Hydrogen atom in Cartesian Coordinates (is this right?):
\hat{H} = - \frac{h^2}{2m_p}\nabla ^2_p - \frac{h^2}{2m_e}\nabla ^2_e - \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon _0r}

First, this form has no explicit reference to Cartesian coordinates.

Second, this is only correct if you define r to be the separation between the proton and the electron; not the distance from the origin.

In Spherical Coordinates do I just use:
x=r sin θ cos φ, y = r sin θ sin φ, and z = r cos θ?

There are many sites and texts that derive expressions for \nabla^2 in Spherical coordinates.
 
Thank you for helping. Do you mind my asking what your search inquiry in google was to find that?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top