How to directly calculate the polarizability

  • Thread starter Thread starter sandf
  • Start date Start date
sandf
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Dear all,
I want to directly calculate the polarizability using the following perturbation expression,
when the ground state wave function |0> is known.
for example, for He atom, r1 and r2 two electrons.

##\alpha = \frac{2}{3}\left\langle {0|({r_1} + {r_2})\frac{1}{{H - {E_0}}}({r_1} + {r_2})|0} \right\rangle ##

How to deal with the term of ## \frac{1}{{H - {E_0}}}## ?

Any help or references will be appreciated.

Best regards.
Youzhao Lan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a bit a longer story. First, have a look on time-independent perturbation theory in a good textbook on quantum theory. The treatment in Sakurai is very good. Then look for the application on the Stark effect (2nd order perturbation theory).
 
Thank you very much, I get it.

Best regards.
Lan
 
Usually, you insert a resolution of the identity in terms of eigenfunctions of H, i.e. ## (H-E_0)^{-1}=\sum_i |i\rangle (E_i-E_0)^{-1}\langle i |##.
 
Dear DrDu,
Thank you very much! The infinite summation seems to be another difficult task for obtaining exact results.
Best regards.
Lan
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top