How to find the position update for Step 2 in Spring Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Troi Jones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Position Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the position update for a block attached to a spring after it is released. Initially, the block's forces, momentum, and velocity are calculated correctly, leading to a position of 0.30666 m at t = 0.09 seconds. However, confusion arises in the second step regarding how to update the position using forces instead of velocity. Participants clarify that the force equations should be used to find the new position, emphasizing that the weight of the mass affects the spring's length change. The correct approach involves manipulating the force equations to account for the forces acting on the block.
Troi Jones
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spring has a relaxed length of 35 cm (0.35 m) and its spring stiffness is 10 N/m. You glue a 70 gram block (0.070 kg) to the top of the spring, and push the block down, compressing the spring so its total length is 12 cm. You make sure the block is at rest, then at time t = 0 you quickly move your hand away. The block begins to move upward, because the upward force on the block by the spring is greater than the downward force on the block by the Earth. Calculate approximately y vs. time for the block during a 0.27-second interval after you release the block, by applying the Momentum Principle in three steps each of 0.09-second duration.

Homework Equations


Fspring= kx
Fgrav= ma
Fnet= Fspring + Fgrav
p= mv
delta p= F*delta t
update position= Vavg*delta t= delta r

The Attempt at a Solution


STEP 1[/B]

Force: Just after releasing the block, calculate the force exerted on the block by the spring, the force exerted on the block by the Earth, and the net force:
Fspring,y = 2.3 NFEarth,y = -0.6867 N
Fnet,y = 1.6133 N

Momentum update: Just after releasing the block, the momentum of the block is zero. Approximate the average net force during the next time interval by the force you just calculated. At t = 0.09 seconds, what will the new momentum and velocity of the block be?
py = 0.145197 kg · m/s
vy = 2.074 m/s

Position update: Initially the bottom of the block is at y = 0.12 m. Approximating the average velocity in the first time interval by the final velocity, what will be the new position of the bottom of the block at time t = 0.09 seconds?
y = 0.30666 mSTEP 2

Force: At the new position, calculate the force exerted on the block by the spring, the force exerted on the block by the Earth, and the net force:
Fspring,y = 0.43 N
FEarth,y = -0.6867 N
Fnet,y = -0.2567 N

Momentum update: Approximate the average net force during the next time interval by the force you just calculated. At time t = 2 × 0.09 = 0.18 seconds, what will the new momentum and velocity of the block be?
py = 0.122094 kg · m/s
vy = 1.744 m/s

Position update: Approximating the average velocity in the second time interval by the final velocity, what will be the new position of the bottom of the block at time t = 2 × 0.09 = 0.18seconds?
y = ? m

I understand everything up until this second step position update. I am not sure how to compute it. My first try I got 0.478478 m but that was incorrect. I appreciated if I could have some guidance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to physicsforums!

Troi Jones said:
Fspring= kx
Fgrav= ma
Fnet= Fspring + Fgrav
p= mv
delta p= F*delta t
Good job at the equations.
Troi Jones said:
update position= Vavg*delta t= delta r
Troi Jones said:
Momentum update: Just after releasing the block, the momentum of the block is zero. Approximate the average net force during the next time interval by the force you just calculated. At t = 0.09 seconds, what will the new momentum and velocity of the block be?
py = 0.145197 kg · m/s
vy = 2.074 m/s

Position update: Initially the bottom of the block is at y = 0.12 m. Approximating the average velocity in the first time interval by the final velocity, what will be the new position of the bottom of the block at time t = 0.09 seconds?
y = 0.30666 m
Here's the thing, you found that the velocity at t=0.09 seconds was vy=2.074 m/s. When you started to calculate the position update, you assumed the same final velocity(2.074 m/s). But this is the velocity at t=0.09, not t=0; at t=0 the particle started with 0 velocity.

So comes the remedy: stop using velocity to calculate position update. Use the force equations instead.
 
phoenix95 said:
Welcome to physicsforums!Good job at the equations.Here's the thing, you found that the velocity at t=0.09 seconds was vy=2.074 m/s. When you started to calculate the position update, you assumed the same final velocity(2.074 m/s). But this is the velocity at t=0.09, not t=0; at t=0 the particle started with 0 velocity.

So comes the remedy: stop using velocity to calculate position update. Use the force equations instead.
Sorry, I am seem to be a bit confuse with the statement of using the force equations to find the new position than using velocity. Do I have to manipulate the force equations and set them equal to delta r?
 
Troi Jones said:
Do I have to manipulate the force equations and set them equal to delta r?
Force equations are fine, no need to manipulate them again.

Troi Jones said:
Fspring= kx
(I didn't notice before but the sign is wrong)
Use this equation. K is a constant forever so only variables are Fspring and x. But this time note that the force that is causing the spring length to change is actually the weight of the mass that is sitting on top of the spring.

Write ΔF = -kΔx, and continue.
 
phoenix95 said:
Force equations are fine, no need to manipulate them again.

(I didn't notice before but the sign is wrong)
Use this equation. K is a constant forever so only variables are Fspring and x. But this time note that the force that is causing the spring length to change is actually the weight of the mass that is sitting on top of the spring.

Write ΔF = -kΔx, and continue.
Ohhhhhh, that makes much more sense now. Thank you very much!
 
phoenix95 said:
Force equations are fine, no need to manipulate them again.

(I didn't notice before but the sign is wrong)
Use this equation. K is a constant forever so only variables are Fspring and x. But this time note that the force that is causing the spring length to change is actually the weight of the mass that is sitting on top of the spring.

Write ΔF = -kΔx, and continue.
Is this how my equation is suppose to be: ΔF = -kΔx = (0.43-2.3)= -(10)(xfinal - 3.0666)?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top