How to know if this irrational function has no asymptotes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the value of 'a' in the function F(x) = x + 1 - 3√((x-1)/(ax+1)) that results in no asymptotes. It is established that if a > 0, the function has two asymptotes, while if a < 0, it has one vertical asymptote. Participants explore the possibility of a = 0, but conclude that it still results in an oblique asymptote. The conversation also touches on how the function behaves as x approaches large values, indicating a trend towards y = x. Ultimately, the determination of the function's domain is contingent on the value of 'a'.
Jeanclaud
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known dat
F(x)=x+1-3sqrt((x-1)/(ax+1))
For which value of a ,(c) has no asymptote?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know if a>0 then (c) will have 2 asymptote
And if a<o then (c) will have 1 vertical asymptote.
But I can't find any value of a so that (c) has no asymptote. Please give me some hints thank you.

[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is leftover after you have eliminated a>0 and a<0? There is only one value possible.
 
RUber said:
What is leftover after you have eliminated a>0 and a<0? There is only one value possible.
a=0? But still it has an O.A.
 
I don't see what you are saying? Your denominator would be (0x+1) = 1.
 
I see now...you meant Oblique Asymptote.
I don't think this would have one.
By scale, yes -- the trend is in the direction of y = x as x gets large, but you can't argue that the function value gets closer to the line in the limit.
 
Jeanclaud said:
a=0? But still it has an O.A.
If a = 1, the part inside the radical approaches 1 for large values of |x|. That will give you an oblique asymptote.
RUber said:
I don't see what you are saying? Your denominator would be (0x+1) = 1.
The OP hasn't been very clear, but I think the asymptotes he's referring to are one that's oblique and one that's vertical.
 
RUber said:
I see now...you meant Oblique Asymptote.
I don't think this would have one.
By scale, yes -- the trend is in the direction of y = x as x gets large, but you can't argue that the function value gets closer to the line in the limit.
Then it will have only an asymptotic direction (parabolic branch). Thank you.
 
Jeanclaud said:
Then it will have only an asymptotic direction (parabolic branch). Thank you.
Determine the domain of this function. That, of course, depends upon the value of a .
 

Similar threads

Back
Top