How to move from the space of moments to the space of energies?

damarkk
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Grand Canonical Ensemble of bosons: how to move from the space of moments to the space of energies?
Relevant Equations
I denote with #\epsilon# the energy of the state particle, and we have ##2m\epsilon = p^2## where
##p^2 = p_{x}^2+p_{y}^2+p_{z}^2##
Suppose we have a gas of bosons with spin 0 and the grand potential is

##\Phi =\frac{kTV}{h^3} \int ln(1-e^{-\beta(p^2/2m -\mu})d^3p##

we already integrated the function in the coordinate space and the result is the factor V (volume). Now, we know that ##\epsilon = p^2/2m## and ##d^3p = 4\pi p^2dp##, and if we change variable because we want to integrate in energies states we have of course ##p^2 = 2m\epsilon## and we obtain ##dp = (2m)^{1/2} \epsilon^{-1/2}d\epsilon##. The expression of ##\Phi## changes and become

##\Phi =\frac{kTV}{h^3} \int ln(1-e^{-\beta(p^2/2m -\mu})4\pi (2m)^{3/2}\epsilon^{1/2}d\epsilon##

or in a better manner

##\Phi =\frac{4\pi kTV(2m)^{3/2}}{h^3} \int ln(1-e^{-\beta(p^2/2m -\mu})\epsilon^{1/2}d\epsilon## (1)


Starting from this expression of the grand potential we can obtain the average number of bosons of the gas system

##N = -\frac{\partial{\Phi}}{\partial{\mu}} = \frac{4\pi V (2m)^{3/2}}{h^3} \int \frac{\epsilon^{1/2}}{e^{\beta(\epsilon-\mu)}-1} d\epsilon## (2)

the expressions (1) and (2) are different from the same that we can read on books like Greiner (Thermodynamics Statistical Mechanics) or Amit (Statistical Physics: and introductory course):

##N = -\frac{\partial{\Phi}}{\partial{\mu}} = \frac{2\pi V (2m)^{3/2}}{h^3} \int \frac{\epsilon^{1/2}}{e^{\beta(\epsilon-\mu)}-1} d\epsilon## (3)

for a factor 2.

And I know this is ridicolous and of course there are some misunderstanding very basic, but I don't understand why my result is double compared with the (3).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
damarkk said:
we already integrated the function in the coordinate space and the result is the factor V (volume). Now, we know that ϵ=p2/2m and d3p=4πp2dp, and if we change variable because we want to integrate in energies states we have of course p2=2mϵ and we obtain dp=(2m)1/2ϵ−1/2dϵ. T
##p^2=2m\epsilon##
##2pdp=2md\epsilon##
##dp=\frac{m}{p} d\epsilon=\frac{\sqrt{m} }{\sqrt{2}\sqrt{\epsilon}} d\epsilon##
it differs factor 1/2 from your result.
 
I'm sorry because this is very a stupid question :D (if you want delete it). Of course the mistake occurs because

##N(k)= \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{4}{3}\pi k^3## and ##\frac{d N}{d k} = \frac{V}{(2\pi)^3}=4\pi k^2##

I substitute ##k^2## with ##2m\epsilon/\hbar^2## and this is the error.

The substitution must be done before the derivation ##N(\epsilon)=\frac{V}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{4}{3}\pi (\frac{2m\epsilon}{\hbar^2})^{3/2} ## and therefore we have

##\frac{d N}{d \epsilon}= \frac{2\pi (2m)^{3/2} \epsilon^{1/2}}{h^3}##

and this is correct.

Alternatively we can compute in this manner:


##\frac{d N}{d \epsilon}=\frac{d N}{d k}\frac{d k}{d \epsilon} =\frac{V}{(2\pi)^{3}} 4\pi (\frac{2m\epsilon}{\hbar^2}) \frac{m}{\hbar\sqrt{2m\epsilon}}##

that is equal to

## \frac{2\pi (2m)^{3/2} \epsilon^{1/2}}{h^3}##
 
damarkk said:
I substitute k2 with 2mϵ/ℏ2 and this is the error.
You may do this substitution anywhere. Just please be careful for taking derivatives as I posted #2.
 
Last edited:
You're right.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top