How to Obtain Reaction of Truss Pinned Connection A, B, and C?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidLee24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction Truss
AI Thread Summary
To obtain the reactions at the pinned connections A, B, and C of the truss, a method for statically indeterminate structures must be used due to the presence of six unknown reaction forces and only three equilibrium equations. The stiffness method is a viable approach for analysis, though it may require additional computational techniques if the structure is complex. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly identifying forces and moments, as initial calculations yielded incorrect results. Participants suggest using nodal analysis and matrix methods for complicated trusses. Understanding the assumptions for determining forces, such as the Near and Far arrows, is also crucial in this analysis.
DavidLee24
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,

Sorry for this newbie question, I would to ask how to I obtain the reaction of the pinned connection of A, B, and C (See attachment)? Do I really have to use Force-Method? I actually attempted to use Moment at different places and do simultaneously (Idk if it's the right thing to do) but apparently I got Ay = 38.07kN, By = 37.39kN and Cy = 0, which I think it is wrong, can anybody help?

Thanks.

-DL
truss.PNG
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The truss is externally statically indeterminate with 6 unknown reaction forces and just 3 equations of equilibrium, so you have to resort to a painstaking indeterminate analysis using a method of your choice.
 
PhanthomJay said:
The truss is externally statically indeterminate with 6 unknown reaction forces and just 3 equations of equilibrium, so you have to resort to a painstaking indeterminate analysis using a method of your choice.

Thanks for the reply, Jay! I've been studying stiffness method to solve for this question. But I have several question that I would like to ask, (see attachment)
truss_2.png

truss_3.png


From the truss, I put them into global coordinate, and named the member (in square), but I would like to ask about the arrow for Near and Far (in Cyan), is there ways to determine or is it assumed by ourselves? Thanks!
 
nodal analysis is how one would do it but as said if there are too many unknowns than knowns, computational methods may have to be used. I know sometimes with complicated trusses using matrices can be an adequate tool I believe.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top