How to Perform a Two-Sample Kuiper Test in R?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joanne34567
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
A user is seeking guidance on performing a two-sample Kuiper test in R, noting the absence of an inbuilt function for this specific test. They mention the v.test function from the {truncgof} package but clarify that it does not meet their needs for a two-sample Kuiper test. The discussion highlights the challenge of finding a suitable statistics program or package that can execute this test. Participants are encouraged to share any solutions or alternative packages that could facilitate the analysis. The conversation underscores the need for more resources or functions in R for conducting this statistical test.
joanne34567
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm trying to do a two-sample Kuiper test on aspect data in R but am having no joy as there doesn't seem to be an inbuilt function. Does anyone have any ideas how this can be done?
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"In built function"? Are you talking about a statistics software package? If so, which one?
 
My problem is that I cannot find a statistics programme or function which can perform a two sample test...
In R there is the v.test in package {truncgof} however this does not perform a two-sample kuiper test and I was wondering if anyone knew how to do this or whether there is a package which can do this?
Thanks
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top