How to Prove Vector Identity k = (a+b)(c+d)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter colerelm1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the vector identity k = (a+b)(c+d) = (a x c) + (a x d) + (b x c) + (b x d). Participants clarify the distinction between vector expansion and the dot product, emphasizing that the original expression involves vector cross products rather than dot products. One user expresses confusion about how to expand the brackets correctly, while another provides a resource for understanding bracket expansion. The conversation highlights the importance of notation in vector operations, specifically differentiating between round and square brackets. Overall, the participants aim to clarify the correct approach to proving the vector identity.
colerelm1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The following are all vectors:
a, b, c, d

k = (a+b) (c+d)

prove: k = (a x c) + (a x d) + (b x c) + (b x d)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to start it by doing:

|a| = a = sqrt(a_x^2 + a_y^2)

is that a correct start at it? I really am pretty lost...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As per my other post, do you understand how to expand the brackets to get between the two solutions for k?

Jared
 
I guess I don't...Could you please explain?
 
Have a read through this:

http://richardbowles.tripod.com/maths/algebra/brackets.htm

It will show you how to expand the brackets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, yeah I know how to do that but what if what I meant by "k = (a+b) (c+d)" was actually the dot product of k = (a+b) (c+d) instead of just k = (a+b) x (c+d)? Does that make a difference?
 
k = (a+b)(c+d) = (a+b)x(c+d) = (a x c)+(a x d)+(b x c)+(b x d)

What you have there is expanding the brackets, this is not the dot product.

The dot product of [a,b][c,d] = ac + bd.

The question shows bracket expansion not dot product. So yes, there is a difference, particularly in notation (dot product = square brackets with commas seperating vectors, expansion = round brackets with standard mathematical operators).
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top