- #1
psie
- 264
- 32
- TL;DR Summary
- I am studying order statistics in An Intermediate Course in Probability by Gut. First the author treats only continuous distributions. In a section on the joint distribution of the extreme order variables ##X_{(n)}=\max\{X_1,\ldots,X_n\}## and ##X_{(1)}=\min\{X_1,\ldots,X_n\}##, the author derives the density of the range. that is ##R_n=X_{(n)}-X_{(1)}##. Then there's an exercise which I simply do not understand why it's in that section.
The exercise that appears in the text is:
What I find confusing about this exercise is that the author has, up until now, not derived any results for order statistics when it comes to discrete distributions. I know the formula for the density of ##X_{(1)}## and the range when the underlying distribution is continuous, but these do not apply for discrete distribution. I was thinking going back to an earlier chapter where the author derives distributions of transformations of random variables. I was thinking I could assume ##X_2## to be greater than ##X_1## and then compute the pmf of their difference, but this doesn't feel like a sensible assumption, since after all, ##\max\{X_1,\ldots,X_n\}## is understood pointwise.
How would you go about solving this exercise?
Exercise 2.5 The geometric distribution is a discrete analog of the exponential distribution in the sense of lack of memory. More precisely, show that if ##X_1## and ##X_2## are independent ##\text{Ge}(p)##-distributed random variables, then ##X_{(1)}## and ##X_{(2)}-X_{(1)}## are independent.
What I find confusing about this exercise is that the author has, up until now, not derived any results for order statistics when it comes to discrete distributions. I know the formula for the density of ##X_{(1)}## and the range when the underlying distribution is continuous, but these do not apply for discrete distribution. I was thinking going back to an earlier chapter where the author derives distributions of transformations of random variables. I was thinking I could assume ##X_2## to be greater than ##X_1## and then compute the pmf of their difference, but this doesn't feel like a sensible assumption, since after all, ##\max\{X_1,\ldots,X_n\}## is understood pointwise.
How would you go about solving this exercise?