How to Use Conservation of Energy to Solve a Loop-the-Loop Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the conservation of energy principle to solve a loop-the-loop problem in physics. Initially, potential energy is at its maximum at the top of the ramp, while kinetic energy is zero. As the object moves through the loop, it must maintain enough kinetic energy to overcome gravitational forces at the top, leading to a potential energy equation that equates initial and final states. Participants clarify that at the top of the loop, kinetic energy cannot be zero, as it must provide centripetal force to prevent falling. The correct answer for the minimum height needed to complete the loop is determined to be 2.5R, factoring in centripetal acceleration.
Goofball Randy
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



vlQD6eH.png

Homework Equations



Conservation of Energy (Potential + Kinetic = Potential + Kinetic)

The Attempt at a Solution



At the start of the ramp, potential energy is mgh (gravitational potential) and kinetic is 0, since it's not moving.
At the bottom of the loop, potential energy is 0 (I consider the bottom to be the zero of gravitational potential to make things easy), and kinetic is 0.5 mv^2.

The ms cancel to leave me with 2gh = v^2, but that's as far as I got...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well keep in mind that it will only have to have enough kinetic energy to get to the top of the roller coaster and also since we need to neglect friction, then at the top of the loop, we can have KE equal to zero, since it will only need to have very minimal Kinetic energy to get over the top of the loop (since the top of the loop is actually a very very small straight line, we know this if we examine the tangent line at the top of the circle but it isn't essential for the problem to be honest).

So take your equation for PE, and set it equal to KE, and make sure you have your h correct. (think about what R means in this case)
 
Last edited:
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
Well keep in mind that it will only have to have enough kinetic energy to get to the top of the roller coaster and also since we need to neglect friction, then at the top of the loop, we can have KE and PE equal to zero, since it will only need to have very minimal Kinetic energy.

So take your equation for PE, and set it equal to KE, and make sure you have your h correct. (think about what R means in this case)

Err, KE and PE are BOTH zero at the top of the loop? How does that make sense when considering the conservation of energy? (mgh + 0 = 0 + 0)

Also, I'm not sure I get what you're saying...set PE equal to KE, isn't that what I did above?
 
Last edited:
Goofball Randy said:
Err, KE and PE are BOTH zero at the top of the loop? How does that make sense when considering the conservation of energy? (mgh + 0 = 0 + 0)
Woops sorry I meant that we only need just enough kinetic energy to get you through the top of the roller coaster so kinetic energy basically is zero at the top, therefore it is maximum potential energy. So PE is KE. Got ahead of myself ha
 
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
Woops sorry I meant that we only need just enough kinetic energy to get you through the top of the roller coaster so kinetic energy basically is zero at the top, therefore it is maximum potential energy. So PE is KE. Got ahead of myself ha

I'm still confused :(
How does finding the energy at the top help me to solve the problem? If KE is basically zero at the top of the loop, that would imply that it's all potential energy...are you saying that PE at the top of the loop is the same as the PE at the very start? Because that would imply that the answer is 2R...
Or am I missing another type of PE?
 
Goofball Randy said:
I'm still confused :(
How does finding the energy at the top help me to solve the problem? If KE is basically zero at the top of the loop, that would imply that it's all potential energy...are you saying that PE at the top of the loop is the same as the PE at the very start? Because that would imply that the answer is 2R...
Or am I missing another type of PE?

You have the right answer! The answer is infact 2R! Do you get why though? The PE has to be at the very least the same PE from the beginning so that it may go through the loop.
 
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
You have the right answer! The answer is infact 2R! Do you get why though? The PE has to be at the very least the same PE from the beginning so that it may go through the loop.

But the answer key says it's "D", or 2.5R. I don't understand why :(
 
Oh sorry then I don't know how to do it either : /
 
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
Oh sorry then I don't know how to do it either : /

Thank you for the help anyway :) I figured out the correct answer.
 
  • #10
Oh I forgot about the centripetal acceleration! The cars can not have 0 KE at the top or else it would just fall straight down! So you want KE energy to be equal to the centripetal acceleration, which is V^2/R, so you want to solve for V, and that will tell you how much KE you need. See where you can go from there.
 
  • #11
RaulTheUCSCSlug said:
you want KE energy to be equal to the centripetal acceleration, which is V^2/R,
An energy cannot equal an acceleration. Consider the force balance at the top of the loop (##\Sigma F_{y} = ma_{y}##).
 
  • Like
Likes RaulTheUCSCSlug
Back
Top