How to write a mathematically rigorous definition of completeness

AI Thread Summary
Completeness in a metric space is defined by the convergence of every Cauchy sequence within that space. A Cauchy sequence is characterized by the condition that for any ε > 0, there exists an integer N such that the distance between terms becomes arbitrarily small as the sequence progresses. The discussion highlights six equivalent properties of completeness in real numbers, including the least upper bound property and the Bolzano-Weierstrass property. Each of these properties can be used to prove the others, demonstrating the interconnectedness of these concepts. Understanding these definitions and their relationships is crucial for a rigorous mathematical formulation of completeness.
royzizzle
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I know that the definition of completeness is that a set contains the limits of rational numbers.

and I know the definition of convergence is that for all e>0 there exists N such that for n>=N |xn - x| < e where x is the limit of the sequence.

how to combine the two?
thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know the definition in terms of metric spaces, so maybe this is what youre looking for...

A metric space (E,d) is called complete if every Cauchy sequence in E converges in E.

of course the definition for cauchy sequence is a sequence given any e>0
there is a positive integer N such that d(pm,pn) < e whenever n,m >N
 
There are, in fact, six properties of the real numbers that are equivalent to "completeness".

1. The least upper bound property (every non-empty set having an upper bound has a least upper bound) and its "twin" the greatest lower bound property.

2. Monotone convergence (every increasing sequence having an upper bound converges and its "twin" that every decreasing sequence having a lower bound converges.)

3. The Cauchy Criterion (every Cauchy sequence converges)

4. The Bolzano-Weierstrass property (every bounded sequence contains a convergent subsequence.)

5. Every closed and bounded set is compact.

6. The set of all real numbers, with the usual metric, is a connected set.

Given anyone of those you can prove the other five.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top