I How was this substitution possible?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter InDireNeedOfHelp
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a specific example from "Fundamentals of Aerodynamics" regarding the integration of an exponent. Participants are trying to understand how the exponent 0.8 was derived and applied in the equation involving c/cos5. There is confusion about the relationship between the variables and how certain terms cancel out, particularly with the assumption that s1 equals zero. The mention of the mean value theorem suggests a deeper mathematical principle may be at play. Clarification on these points is sought to resolve the confusion surrounding the integration process and variable relationships.
InDireNeedOfHelp
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I'm currently going over Fundamentals of Aerodynamics by Anderson and am stuck on this tiny step of an example.
I'm currently going over Fundamentals of Aerodynamics by Anderson and am stuck on this tiny step. It is example 1.1 on page 26.

How is
1744898520535.png
equal to
1744898539567.png
? How was the 0.8 exponent taken out of the equation to make space for c/cos5?

1744898412261.png
?hash=f53d387e6e28ef240be978235c9a2f3f.png

Thank you in advance. Apologies for the formatting if it was confusing as I am new to this.
 

Attachments

  • 1744898429207.png
    1744898429207.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 30
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It looks like the book integrated ##s^{-0.2}## to ##\dfrac{s^{0.8}}{0.8}## using the usual antiderivative rule for exponents: $$\frac{d}{dx}\big (\frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} \big) = x^n$$
 
PeroK said:
It just look likes the book integrated ##s^{-0.2}## to ##\dfrac{s^{0.8}}{0.8}## using the usual antiderivative rule for exponents: $$\frac{d}{dx}\big (\frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} \big) = x^n$$
Hi! I understand that bit on how to integrate but I'm confused about this part: if c/cos5 = s
12, & s12= s2- s1, how is it that s20.8 - s10.8 = s120.8 = (c/cos5)0.8

Is my line of reasoning correct? Thanks
 
InDireNeedOfHelp said:
Hi! I understand that bit on how to integrate but I'm confused about this part: if c/cos5 = s
12, & s12= s2- s1, how is it that s20.8 - s10.8 = s120.8 = (c/cos5)0.8

Is my line of reasoning correct? Thanks
Without more context, I don't see it either.
 
##\dfrac{c}{\cos 5°}## is the length of ##\overline{14}=\overline{12}## that is the vector in the picture. Maybe it is the mean value theorem of integration.
 
fresh_42 said:
##\dfrac{c}{\cos 5°}## is the length of ##\overline{14}=\overline{12}## that is the vector in the picture. Maybe it is the mean value theorem of integration.
Hmmmmm. Thank you for replying but after a lot of thinking, I believe the author used s1 to be 0 so it canceled out. This would be the only way that s20.8 = s120.8 = (c/cos5)0.8.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top