Hydrogen Atom Ground State Wavefunction Normalisation Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter White Ink
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normalisation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on normalizing the wavefunction of a hydrogen atom in its ground state, given by Ψ(r) = C/√(4π)e^(-r/a₀). A participant initially calculated the normalization constant C as C = √(8π/a₀) but was uncertain about its correctness. Others pointed out the need to integrate over three-dimensional space using spherical coordinates, which requires including an additional factor of r² in the integrand. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying the volume differential in spherical coordinates to achieve accurate results. Ultimately, the participants clarify the normalization process and correct their understanding of the integration involved.
White Ink
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A hydrogen atom in the ground state can be described by the following wavefunction:

\Psi(r) = \frac{C}{\sqrt{4\pi}}e^{- \frac{r}{a_{0}}}

Normalise this wavefunction.

The Attempt at a Solution



I did this and got:

C = \sqrt{\frac{8\pi}{a_{0}}}

I have no way of checking this, so I was wondering if anybody could tell me whether I am right or wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite, I don't think. Can you show us how you got that?
 
\int^{\infty}_{0}\left|\Psi(r)\right|^{2}dr = 1\frac{C^{2}}{4\pi}\int^{\infty}_{0}e^{\frac{-2r}{a_{0}}}dr = 1u = \frac{2r}{a_{0}}

du = \frac{2}{a_{0}}dr

dr = \frac{a_{0}}{2}du\frac{C^{2}}{4\pi}\frac{a_{0}}{2}\int^{\infty}_{0}e^{-u}du = 1

Using:

\int^{\infty}_{0}x^{n}e^{-x}dx = n!

\int^{\infty}_{0}e^{-u}du = 0! = 1

Thus:

\frac{C^{2}}{4\pi}\frac{a_{0}}{2} = 1

C^{2} = \frac{8\pi}{a_{0}}
 
Think again about the first integral. Even if the wavefunction is only dependent on r, you are still integrating over three-dimensional space. Use the appropriate volume differential for this case (spherical coordinates).

You will notice the equation will reduce to an integral in just r, but it'll have a key difference with the one you're using right now.
 
Proggle said:
Think again about the first integral. Even if the wavefunction is only dependent on r, you are still integrating over three-dimensional space. Use the appropriate volume differential for this case (spherical coordinates).

You will notice the equation will reduce to an integral in just r, but it'll have a key difference with the one you're using right now.

I know exactly what you mean (integrating in the \theta & \phi directions becomes equivalent to multiplying to constant in front of the integration with respect to r by 2\pi^{2}, since the wavefunction is independent of those two variables). I read over the question too quickly. Thank you for your help.
 
White Ink said:
I know exactly what you mean (integrating in the \theta & \phi directions becomes equivalent to multiplying to constant in front of the integration with respect to r by 2\pi^{2}, since the wavefunction is independent of those two variables). I read over the question too quickly. Thank you for your help.

In addition there will be an extra factor of r^2 in the integrand, right?
 
Dick said:
In addition there will be an extra factor of r^2 in the integrand, right?

Now that one beats me. I can't see where an additional r^{2} would come from.
 
dV in spherical coordinates is r^2*sin(theta)*dr*dtheta*dphi. Better look that up to make sure my use of angle names agrees with yours. And you won't get a pi^2 from the integration, do it carefully.
 
Ooops, I feel stupid now. I forgot about the metric coefficients and took my volume element to be drd\theta . At least I won't be making that mistake again. Thanks.
 
Back
Top