Hyperfocal distance v. far-field

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigtrueba
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Hyperfocal distance refers to the specific focal length where objects at a certain distance, typically half of this distance to infinity, are in focus, determined by the lens's focal length and f-number. This concept is distinct from the near and far-field phenomena, which relate to the behavior of light waves at varying distances from a source. The far-field region allows for certain mathematical approximations related to diffraction, while the near-field includes both propagating and non-propagating components. Understanding hyperfocal distance is crucial for achieving optimal depth of field in photography, but it does not involve the angle at which light meets the lens. Overall, hyperfocal distance and near/far-field concepts are fundamentally different in their applications and implications.
bigtrueba
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, in class we were talking about lenses and how there is a certain focal length where all images 'far enough' away are in focus. I was doing some wikipedia searching and found the hyperfocal distance. Is that what this is?

I was also reading somewhere about near/far-field. from what i understand the far field is when light comes in perfectly parallel, but this usually takes a very long distance (light years). These two phenomena are not related are they? (hyperfocal distance and the far field) i mean, the idea behind the hyperfocal distance is not the angle at which the light meets the lens, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea of 'depth of focus' (or depth of field) is intuitively obvious, but quantitatively, it's very difficult to express. One concept that is important to understand is that your eye has a limit on what it can resolve- anything smaller than this 'circle of confusion', 'blur circle', or what have you, is considered indistinguishable from a perfect point.

The hyperfocal distance is found by setting the depth of focus to a maximum- a lens that is focused on an object located at this distance H- say, 16 feet- will produce an image with everything in focus from H/2 to infinity. The hyperfocal distance is a function of the focal length and the f-number, and there's a lot of online depth of field calculators that can help you understand the concept better.

Near and far field is totally different- far-field simply means that certain mathematical approximations (Fraunhofer region) to diffraction hold and starts around 10*wavelength, while near-field is (generally) the region within 1 or 2 wavelengths of the source/object. The near field has both propagating and nonpropagating (evanescent) components to the electromagnetic field, while the far-field has only propagating modes.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top