Ideas for launching projectile rocket

AI Thread Summary
To successfully launch a rocket-like projectile from a 2-inch diameter tube at a 60-degree angle, it's essential to consider the center of gravity, ensuring the golf ball remains securely at the top. Using construction paper, options include creating a conical shape to hold the ball in place, while reinforcing the tube with tape and adding a perforated base plate for slight pressurization during launch. It's recommended to use construction glue for securing the ball, as it offers better adhesion than Superglue. Additionally, incorporating fins can enhance stability and increase distance. The design should prioritize minimizing aerodynamic drag for optimal performance.
Prototype
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
For a class assignment, I must construct a rocket-like projectile to launch in a launching tube of 2 inches in diameter and about a little less than 2 meters in length. I am given a hard-type construction paper to make the rocket and a golf ball as my "astronaut" to be put inside when launching. I can do it whatever way I want and the competition is to see who can get the most distance. The catch is that the launching tube will be at an angle of 60 degrees. My physics teacher gave a hint as to how to make the launch a success and that is to take into consideration the center of gravity so I must find a way to have the golf ball placed at the top of the rocket and have it remain there throughout the launching to achieve distance. The problem is how will I get it to stay there? I can use glue, tape, etc. Another idea is to have a conical shape rocket with the sharp point at the back end and the front the base of the cone so it can hold the ball in place and just put the nose or nozzle to cover it up. So my question is, which way is the best to go about constructing the rocket for greatest distance? How long should the body of the rocket be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this really a rocket, or more like a gun? To clarify: If it is a gun, the projectile is fired out of the tube and then flies freely. If it is a rocket, it has an engine on it that thrusts after the projectile leaves the tube.
 
Well it is a shape of a rocket but treated as a projectile.
 
Prototype said:
Well it is a shape of a rocket but treated as a projectile.
Damn! There goes my special rocket motor idea! If it's going to be a projectile, leave the tube hollow. Reinforce it if you can, say by wrapping tape around it. Also, if possible, put some kind of perforated base-plate in the bottom. Tape or glue the ball in position. It shouldn't undergo enough g-force to move it down the tube. The reasoning behind the hollow tube with base plate is that it will become somewhat (not much) pressurized during launch, and then release the pressure through the base as if it really were a rocket. It can be good for a few extra feet of distance. For the ball, use construction glue (Elmer's, etc.) rather than any kind of Superglue. It's a lot better for things like this. Also, construct a cone to cover the ball and thus minimize your aerodynamic drag. If allowed, some kind of fins would also be helpful for stabilization and therefore extra mileage.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top