Identifying Particles by Mass: A High-Energy Physics Experiment

AI Thread Summary
In a high-energy physics experiment, a particle with a radius of 0.27 m in a magnetic field of 2.7*10^-2 T and a kinetic energy of 4.1*10^16 J was analyzed to identify its mass. The calculations involved using the kinetic energy formula and the relationship between radius, mass, velocity, charge, and magnetic field. A mistake was made in the math, emphasizing the importance of not skipping steps in calculations. Ultimately, the particle was identified as a proton, highlighting the need for thoroughness in problem-solving. This discussion serves as a reminder to always show all work to avoid errors.
tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
why u should not skip steps

In a high-energy physics experiment, a subnuclear particle moves in a circular arc of 0.27-m radius perpendicular to a magnetic field of 2.7*10^-2 T. The kinetic energy of the particle is determined to be 4.1*10^16 J. Identify the particle from its mass. The masses of the electron, pion, and proton are 9.1*10^-31 kg, 2.5*10^-28 kg, and 1.67*10^-27 kg, respectively. Assume that the particle is known to have a positive charge equal to the magnitude of the electron charge.

Okay, so I know r= 0.27, B= 2.7*10^-2, q= 1.6*10^-19 C, and KE= 4.1*10^-16 J. Now I need to find mass to id the particle.
KE = \frac{mv^2}{2}, so v = \sqrt{2m * (KE)}.
r = \frac{mv}{qB}, and then I subbed in the v from the kinetic energy equation.
r = \frac{m\sqrt{2m * (KE)}}{qB}
\frac{rqB}{\sqrt{2KE}} = m^{3/2}
m = 1.49*10^-9.

I really screwed this up didnt I? Was it a conceptual or a math error?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Crap.

So it was a dumb math error. Perfect example of why you shouldn't skip steps like I do.

KE = \frac{mv^2}{2} \rightarrow 2KE = mv^2 \rightarrow \frac{2KE}{m} = v^2 \rightarrow v = \sqrt{\frac{2KE}{m}}.

Remember guys, show all your work!
hehe,
Tchicken.
 
By the way, the particle is a proton.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top