If no singularity, what’s inside a big black hole?

[John232]

The amount of matter to energy conversion could be dependant on the size of the black hole. A smaller black hole could have more matter and a black hole with a large radius could have more energy. But with the lack of a definitive quantum gravity there would be no way to know for sure on how much matter or energy a black hole would contain.

 

[John232]

Then again, if time stops at the event horizon when would an object find itself at the center of a black hole?

 

[Bernie G]

If a quark/radiation star existed in a black hole, and was supported by radiation pressure, would gravity in the star be Newtonian or relativistic? (Gravity outside the star would be obviously relativistic.)

 

[John232]

I don't get what you mean by the gravity being Newtonian. I would hope not since relativity is supposed to describe gravity more accurately than Newtonian physics.

 

[John232]

I think that, as the exit velocity became greater than the speed of light, it may become farther from being general relativity, than general relativity is from newtoinion physics outside of the black hole, IIF the exit velocity being greater than the speed of light allowed objects in the black hole to travel FTL. Tachyon's have not really been proven to not exist, so then it would look more like tachyon particle physics.

 

[Bernie G]

Relativistic gravity is where space or the path of light is significantly curved. If you had a situation where radiation pressure was strong enough to counteract gravity, wouldn’t the path of light be random 3-axis thermal motion instead of a curved line?