If the big crunch theory is correct, Then wouldn't history repeat itself?

In summary: There are also limitations in predicting the future, but that does not mean that history will not repeat itself.
  • #1
thewhills
95
0
Assuming the Universe collapses into a giant black hole and the energy as a result leads to a 2nd Big Bang, Wouldn't "history" repeat itself?

Assuming condition were the same which I don't see why they wouldn't be and energy content will be identical.

But the only problem is this would assume all scientific law are the same, which is unknown.

Wouldn't this fulfill Laplace's demon since the the energy is in a single place?

this is very speculative,it is just a thought...I am a physics noob,,,,
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
thewhills said:
Assuming the Universe collapses into a giant black hole and the energy as a result leads to a 2nd Big Bang, Wouldn't "history" repeat itself?

Assuming condition were the same which I don't see why they wouldn't be and energy content will be identical.

But the only problem is this would assume all scientific law are the same, which is unknown.

Wouldn't this fulfill Laplace's demon since the the energy is in a single place?

this is very speculative,it is just a thought...I am a physics noob,,,,

My guess is that the uncertainty principle suggests history will not repeat itself. Einstein famously said "God does not play dice with the universe". Modern quantum theory suggests Einstein was wrong on that point. However, just because for example we are unable to predict which atom in a radioactive sample will decay next, that does not in itself prove that if the universe replayed itself the exact same atoms would decay in the same sequence. That is the deterministic view of the universe and it implies no free will. In other words, whatever we decisions we make, however carefully thought out or random they seem, we would have done it anyway. One of the explanations for quantum phenomena is that every event in the universe from the Big Bang to the infinite future is predetermined and it is very difficult to prove that is not the case. Does anyone know of a proof?
 
  • #3
But hasn't everything happened for a set reason involving energy?
For some reason post-big bang, matter formed in certain places. Energy also moved in certain ways for reasons...right?

Isn't the universe like one giant chain reaction?
 
  • #4
No. Read what was said above about the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. It means that the universe is not deterministic.
 
  • #5
Deterministic or not, it does not really matter.

If there is finite matter and finite space, there are only so many ways to combine them. If the cycle is infinite, then yes, history would repeat itself. Not necessarily right away, but eventually. In fact, every possible combination would happen an infinite number of times.

k
 
  • #6
kev said:
My guess is that the uncertainty principle suggests history will not repeat itself.
The uncertainty principle does not exclude the universe from being deterministic, it just states that there are limitations in measuring.
 

FAQ: If the big crunch theory is correct, Then wouldn't history repeat itself?

What is the big crunch theory?

The big crunch theory is a theoretical model in astrophysics that suggests that the universe will eventually stop expanding and begin to contract until all matter in the universe collapses into a single point.

How would the big crunch theory cause history to repeat itself?

If the big crunch theory is correct, the universe would eventually reach a point where all matter is densely packed together. This would result in a massive explosion and the formation of a new universe. This cycle would continue indefinitely, causing history to repeat itself.

Is there any evidence to support the big crunch theory?

Currently, there is no conclusive evidence to support the big crunch theory. Some studies suggest that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, making a big crunch scenario unlikely. However, further research and observations are needed to fully understand the fate of the universe.

How would the big crunch theory affect life on Earth?

If the big crunch theory is correct, it would mean that the universe has a finite lifespan and will eventually come to an end. This would have significant implications for life on Earth, as the universe would ultimately become inhospitable for any form of life.

Are there any alternative theories to the big crunch?

Yes, there are several alternative theories to the big crunch, including the big rip theory and the heat death theory. These theories propose different outcomes for the universe, such as a gradual expansion until all matter is scattered or a state of complete entropy where all energy is evenly distributed.

Similar threads

Replies
56
Views
7K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Back
Top