- #1
Toppy123
- 6
- 0
Does the fact that time is infinitely divisible have implications for studying the big bang?
As with all studies of historic events, we are looking at the big bang from a backwards perspective. So, if we look at the first second of the start of our universe in the big bang model, we try to chip away backwards from 1 second in order to get to the beginning, eg half a second from the big bang, 0.1 seconds from the big bang, 1 millionth of a second from the big bang, etc. However, if time is infinitely divisible, can we ever get to 0 (the start) or are we destined to chip away without getting to the beginning?
Does this attribute of time (its infinite divisibility) mean that there is a paradox - there can be a start but that the start is infinitely far away (in time) that we can never actually study the moment itself?
As with all studies of historic events, we are looking at the big bang from a backwards perspective. So, if we look at the first second of the start of our universe in the big bang model, we try to chip away backwards from 1 second in order to get to the beginning, eg half a second from the big bang, 0.1 seconds from the big bang, 1 millionth of a second from the big bang, etc. However, if time is infinitely divisible, can we ever get to 0 (the start) or are we destined to chip away without getting to the beginning?
Does this attribute of time (its infinite divisibility) mean that there is a paradox - there can be a start but that the start is infinitely far away (in time) that we can never actually study the moment itself?