Induction motor windings, number of turns per phase and per pole

  • Thread starter Thread starter rulmismo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poles Windings
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of turns per phase in induction motor windings, emphasizing the relationship between phase voltage, frequency, and flux. The formula provided indicates that the flux used should reflect the mean flux across the entire machine, with considerations for different pole configurations. For a two-pole machine, the turns are concentrated in one winding, while for a four-pole machine, the turns can be distributed either in parallel or series to maintain consistent flux loading. The conversation also touches on the implications of using multi-phase motors, particularly in relation to achieving phase differences in single-phase systems. Overall, the thread seeks clarification on these winding principles and their practical applications in motor design.
rulmismo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have some question regarding windings on induction motors, if anybody can help.
Reviewing some literature (*), the usual formulae to get the number of turns per phase of a induction motor winding is
  • Eph= RMS phase voltage [V]
  • Nph= number of turns of phase winding
  • f= frequency [Hz]
  • FL="involved" flux (typically set by a limit of Bmean * involved area, being Bmean about 0.7T for a typical machine) [Wb]
  • p=number of pole pairs
  • K= winding factor
Nph= Eph / (4.44 * f * FL * K )

My question is regarding the flux to be used. Most of the books and references I found talk in this equation of a "per pole" flux, but voltage in the formulae is phase voltage (and you can have several poles per phase winding), so my current understanding is:
- if p=1 (2 pole machine), Nph shall be concentrated in one winding, and flux involved is the "mean" of the whole machine
- if p=2,(4 pole machine), flux loading (Bmean) must be the same so I think:
if poles are feed in paralel (is this the usual case?), Npole=Nphase of the p=1 machine, to keep same flux loading.
if poles are feed in series, Npole=Nphase/p, to keep same flux loading (so same total turns, but distributed between the poles.)
- p=3....

I would appreciate any insight or correction, any reference to a worked example of higher pole machine design or windings could also help.

Thanks!

(*) References just in case can help anybody
ref1
ref2
ref3
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Does the 4 pole motor uses single phase power? I am not sure why you would have a 4 pole motor if you have 3 phase power. If it is a single phase motor, the pole windings will have to have different reactance in order to create a phase difference between the two pole pairs. So the windings will depend on how that phase difference is achieved.

AM
 
These are m-phase motor, in the usual case m is three, then phase windings are the same, but displaced 120º. My question is related to how many turns you would use per pole, so to keep flux within saturation limits.

A n-pole motor (with n>2) is used when you want a lower synchronous speed.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top