Info regarding energy density of empty space?

FluffyFriend
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, new guy here.

I once saw a graph on the development of the energy density of the universe, with the X axis measuring time (I believe it was in billion years or so) while the Y axis meansuring the density.

There were three lines in that graph, energy density of empty space, energy density of (visible) matter and cosmo constant.

And that graph showed somehow we exist pretty much at the time period when the two of them crosses (forgot which two but I believe it should be "visible matter line" and "cosmo constant line")

So any of you ppl can be kindly enough to post that graph here? Or even draw me one? I thought I saw it on a magazine in a library but failed to locate it after pawing through almost 2 years' publication.

Also, I'd like to know if there is a consensus on whether the zero-point energy can be utilized. Based on what I've read, most scientist deems the zero-point energy has little practical use. I'd be delighted to know that I was misinformed.

None of the issue above was a part or related to homework of any kind, should mod find this topic inappropriate for any reason, this thread can be deleted.

And BTW, sorry for my linguistic skills. I'm not a native speaker.

Thanks in advance and have a nice day.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a partial answer at least, I believe there is a rather widely held belief that it is impossible to do anything useful with the zero-point energy (or equivalently, that the actual value of the zero-point energy has no physical consequences, so it might as well be zero).
 
Any help is appreciated, thanks a lot.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top