Inner product with maximally entangled state

rmp251
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Consider the maximum inner product of a density operator with a maximally entangled state. (So, given a density operator, we're maximizing over all maximally entangled states.)

I'm pretty sure the minimum value (a lower bound on the maximum) for this is 1/n2, using the density operator 1/n2 identity. How can I prove that is the minimum?

Thanks!
Reuben
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can you please write down the density operator you are talking about; and what you mean by 'maximum inner product of a density operator with a maximally entangled state'.
 
Sorry I realize that was a little incomplete. Let \mathcal{X} and \mathcal{Y} be complex Euclidean spaces with dim(\mathcal{X})=dim(\mathcal{Y})=n.

Define

<br /> M(\rho) = \max\left\{&lt;u u^{\ast},\rho&gt;\,:\,u\in\mathcal{X}\otimes\mathcal{Y}\;\text{is maximally entangled}<br /> \right\}<br />

for any density operator \rho on \mathcal{X}\otimes\mathcal{Y}.

For \rho=\frac{1}{n^2}\text{I} we get M=\frac{1}{n^2}

How can I show that that is the minimum value of M over all possible density operators \rho?
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top