Innner products and basis representation

iontail
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
hi, I have a quickon vector spaces.

Say for example we have


X = a1U1 + a2U2 ...anUn
this can be written as

X = sum of ( i=0 to n) ai Ui


now how can I get and expression of ai in therms of X and Ui.

do we use inner product to do this...ans someone please explain how to go forward.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the Ui basis is "orthonormal" then, taking the inner product of X with Uk gives <X, U_n]>= a_1 <U_1,U_k>+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_k<U_k,U_k>+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_n<U_n, U_k>= a_1(0)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_k(1)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_n(0)= a_k.

That is, for an orthonormal basis, a_k= <X, U_k>. If the basis is NOT orthonormal, there is no simple formula. That's why orthonormal bases are so popular!
 
the basis is orthonormal...so the solution you suggested should be ok...however i don't have latex and have never used it before so can't view your reply. do I just downlad latex to view the thread or do I have to do something else.
 
thanks for the reply...as well.
 
LaTeX

iontail said:
...however i don't have latex and have never used it before so can't view your reply. do I just downlad latex to view the thread or do I have to do something else.

Hi iontail! :smile:

You don't need to "have" LaTeX, it should be visible anyway.

There's just something wrong with that particular LaTeX …I can't read it either :rolleyes:

(I can't see what's wrong with the code though.)

To see the original code, just click on the REPLY button. :wink:
 
Here is what HallsofIvy want to write:

<X, U_n]>= a_1 <U_1,U_k>+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_k<U_k,U_k>+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_n<U_n, U_k>= a_1(0)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_k(1)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_n(0)= a_k
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top