Insight/Intuition into rotations in R²

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding rotation matrices in R², specifically the equations x' = x cos(θ) - y sin(θ) and y' = x sin(θ) + y cos(θ). The user seeks a visual and intuitive explanation of how the terms -y sin(θ) and x sin(θ) affect the values along the axes, questioning whether these contributions maintain the correct distance from the origin. They express frustration with algebraic proofs and prefer geometric interpretations to clarify their understanding. The conversation also touches on the relationship between the components of the rotation and the orientation in the plane, emphasizing the need for visual aids to grasp the concepts effectively. Visual explanations are essential for a better understanding of rotation matrices.
STENDEC
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I've been using rotation matrices for quite some time now without fully grasping them. Whenever I tried to develop an intuitive understanding of...<br /> x&#039; = x\cos\theta - y\sin\theta \\<br /> y&#039; = x\sin\theta + y \cos\theta<br />... I failed and gave up. I've looked at numerous online texts and videos, but following the step-by-step explanations didn't lead to me seeing the whole picture as I had hoped.

Could someone explain to me (like I'm 5 years old), why -y\sin\theta and x\sin\theta are used to affect the value along the other axis?

Looking at the following picture (pardon the quality):
drawing.png

Is the contribution of y to x and vice versa there, to ensure that P maintains the correct distance to the origin, or is that a misguided simplification of mine? The yellow line cannot be sin + cos (Pythagorean theorem) yet I may combine these two to get x&#039; and y&#039;. Do you see where my gap in understanding lies? Is there a drawing that could clarify how these terms combine to give the correct value we observe? Algebraic proofs don't work with me I'm afraid, I need a geometric/visual explanation.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The component ##\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x\cos\theta\\y\cos\theta\end{smallmatrix}\right)## represents the projection of ##\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x'\\y'\end{smallmatrix}\right)## onto the original vector ##\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x\\y\end{smallmatrix}\right)##. The other component (the "rejection") should therefore have magnitude ##|\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\sin\theta|## and be orthogonal to the projection. There are two unique solutions for such a vector.

Finally, when ##\theta## is nonzero but less than a straight angle, an increase in ##y'## corresponds to a decrease in ##x'##; i.e., the x-component of the rejection should be negative. (This condition is equivalent to a choice of orientation on ##\mathbb{R}^2##.) This tells us which solution is the desired one.

As for your drawing, I don't quite understand what you mean. Could you elaborate?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top