Instantaneous Unit Conversion between CGS and SI units

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the conversion of the CGS unit "erg/(sec rad cm)" to SI units for power, specifically watts. Participants clarify that this unit may represent intensity rather than power, suggesting it should be expressed in steradians instead of radians. The original poster confirms the context involves synchrotron radiation from a particle beam, linking it to the relativistic Larmor formula. They eventually found a different equation in SI units that provided reasonable results, highlighting confusion due to inconsistent unit usage in reference materials. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding unit contexts in physics.
KJ4EPE
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In doing some research, I cam across an equation for instantaneous radiated power, with the CGS units "erg/(sec rad cm)", rad being radians (not rad the unit for radiation exposure). Try as I might, I'm not able to come up with a way to convert it to the SI units for watts. Does anyone know where I might find the information about this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi KJ4EPE! :smile:

Are you sure this is power? erg/(sec rad cm) looks more like some form of intensity …

there's a useful table of intensities and radiances at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensity_(physics)"

but I can't see anything there equivalent to erg/(sec rad cm) :confused:

(and I'd expect steradian instead of radian … erg/(sec rad cm) looks to me cylindrical rather than spherical … is this for a "cylindrical" transmitter?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually it is! It's for determining the power of synchrotron radiation emitted from a particle beam, essentially the relativistic form of the Larmor formula. But anyway, someone at work was able to point me in the direction of a different equation in SI units, and the results seem to be reasonable. I was confused cause one of the books I was using this morning used the same equation for both SI and CGS units, and I had a hard time figuring out what to use.
 

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Unit Conversions of Force: How to Convert Between Different Units of Force?
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Question about cgs vs SI units in the context of the Debye Length
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Dimension of an Angle: Clarifying the SI Standard
Replies
1
Views
2K
Conversion factor when converting from SI to natural units
Replies
1
Views
879
Why Is the Conversion Between CGS and SI Units in Electromagnetism Confusing?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Problem about units conversion: cm^2 --> m^2
Replies
4
Views
180
B Why I think radians should *not* be dimensionless
Replies
10
Views
6K
Why Isn't Horsepower an SI Unit, Despite Its Popularity?
Replies
29
Views
4K
A CGS units confusions in plasma physics journal papers
Replies
22
Views
13K
I How to Convert Cgs to SI Units for Flux and Energy Values?
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top