Integrating infinitesimal conformal transformations

Rocky Raccoon
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
While it's pretty easy to derive the infinitesimal version of the special conformal transformation of the coordinates:

x'^{\mu}=x^{\mu}+c_{\nu}(x^{\mu} x^{\nu}-g^{\mu \nu} x^2)

with c infinitesimal,

how does one integrate it to obtain the finite version transformation:

x'^{\mu}=\frac{x^{\mu}-x^2 c^{\mu}}{1-2 x^{\nu} c_{\nu} + x^2 c^2}

with c finite?


I've never delt with nonlinear transformations that don't exponentiate trivially. Also, how does one integrate over a parameter that is Lorentz contracted with another vector?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(First of all, I think you're missing a 2, it should be (2xμxν - gμνx2)).

In general, the way to exponentiate a transformation that acts nonlinearly is to find a different set of variables on which it is linear. In the present case, the conformal group can be generated by a) Lorentz transformations Λ, b) translations T, and c) inversion R. The inversion is R: xμ → xμ/xνxν. The transformation you're looking at is called a transversion, and can be written in terms of the generators as V = RTR-1. This gives you a clue that what you need to do to linearize V is to look at its effect on the inverted position vector, yμ ≡ xμ/xνxν. The action on yμ will be linear and easily exponentiated, and then you can go back and express the result in terms of x.
 
Yes, you're absolutely right, I'm missing a factor of 2.

So, you're saying that a simple change in variables will do the trick. I'll certainly try to do it that way. But, I was more thinking along the lines of solving the equation: dx^{\mu}=dc_{\nu}(2x^{\mu} x^{\nu} - g^{\mu \nu} x^2)? Can it be integrated?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top