Interference vs. diffraction patterns

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between interference and diffraction patterns, specifically the condition where the fourth minimum of the interference pattern coincides with the first minimum of the diffraction pattern. The correct ratio of slit width (a) to distance between slits (d) is determined to be 1/4. The user initially calculated the ratio as 1/3 but later realized that proper cancellation of terms leads to the correct answer. Clarification on whether the original problem stated minimum or maximum was sought, confirming it was indeed minimum. This highlights the importance of careful interpretation of conditions in wave interference and diffraction problems.
vetgirl1990
Messages
85
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The centres of two slits of width a are a distance d apart. If the fourth minimum of the interference pattern occurs at the location of the first minimum of the diffraction pattern for light, the ratio a/d is equal to:

ANS: 1/4

Homework Equations


Here are the various interference conditions for interference and diffraction:

Interference conditions for double slit:
MAX: dsinθ = mλ
MIN: dsinθ = (m+½)λ

Diffraction conditions for a single slit:
MAX: asinθ = (m+½)λ
MIN: asinθ = mλ

Diffraction conditions for diffraction grating:
MAX: asinθ = mλ
MIN: asinθ = (m+½)λ

The Attempt at a Solution


I will walk through my reasoning...
I've classified the diffraction component of this problem as diffraction grating rather than diffraction through a single slit, because based on this setup, there are two slits for diffraction to occur through. While we normally see grating in the order of 2500grates/cm, 2grates/cm would still be considered grating.

So based on that logic, the conditions for minimum for both are:
Diffraction: dsinθ = (m+½)λ, where m=1
Interference: asinθ = (m+½)λ, where m=4

Now, when I plug in all the values for m, and cancel out all the similarities (sinθ, λ):
asinθ=(1+½)λ --> a=1.5
dsinθ=(4+½)λ --> d=4.5
The ratio I get for a/d = 1.5/4.5 = ⅓

HOWEVER, I noticed that if I cancel out ½ rather than adding it to m like I did above, then the ratio for a/d=¼.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vetgirl1990 said:
If the fourth minimum of the interference
Could you please check again in the original problem, is it minimum or maximum?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Could you please check again in the original problem, is it minimum or maximum?
The original question does indeed say minimum.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top