MHB Interpretation of estimated coefficients

AI Thread Summary
The discussion confirms that the model in question is linear, with the expectation that the coefficient for distance will be negative, indicating that trade decreases as distance increases. The coefficient reflects the rate of change in trade relative to distance. There is a focus on the importance of precise wording in interpreting the coefficients, with a suggestion to avoid overly pedantic language that may hinder understanding. The interpretation should emphasize the partial derivative of trade flow concerning distance. Clarity in communication is essential for effective analysis.
Usagi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/402/question2s.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Usagi said:
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/402/question2s.jpg

Is this a linear model?

If so you expect the coefficient for the distance term be negative, other things being equal you expect the trade between the countries to decline with increasing distance. The coefficient is the rate at which trade varies with distance.

CB
 
Oh yeah sorry I forgot to add (yes it is a linear model), but attached is the regression output from Eviews 7:

My main concern is whether my wording for the interpretation is correct or not because my teacher told me to be very pedantic when giving an interpretation and rather than saying "all else constant" I have to list out all the other variables.

Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • kkk.JPG
    kkk.JPG
    33.5 KB · Views: 80
Usagi said:
Oh yeah sorry I forgot to add (yes it is a linear model), but attached is the regression output from Eviews 7:

My main concern is whether my wording for the interpretation is correct or not because my teacher told me to be very pedantic when giving an interpretation and rather than saying "all else constant" I have to list out all the other variables.

Thanks :)

Too much pedantry is the enemy of understanding.

It is the partial derivative of the trade flow with respect to distance.

CB
 
Last edited:

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
View full post »

Similar threads

B How to interpret Pascal's Triangle for negative numbers?
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB -aux.05 coefficient of determination is 83.0 %
Replies
3
Views
1K
MHB Polynomial with integer coefficients
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB -c11.interpretation of division
Replies
1
Views
942
MHB Solving a Third-Degree Polynomial with Real Coefficients
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Mechanics: Find Coefficient of Friction on 34° Slope w/ 0.4
Replies
9
Views
1K
MHB How should I interpret a formula without brackets?
Replies
3
Views
1K
MHB Coefficient of Friction: Finding in a Factory
Replies
3
Views
1K
Calculating Gini Coefficient - Unbiased Estimator
Replies
2
Views
2K
What is the Equivalent Resistance for this Homework Statement?
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top